Re: Linux-2.4.4 failure to compile

2001-05-19 Thread David Weinehall
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 04:41:16PM +0600, Anuradha Ratnaweera wrote: > > On Fri, 18 May 2001, Lorenzo Marcantonio wrote: > > > On Thu, 17 May 2001, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > > > > I think the header file you're talking about is the db1 header file, > > > which has nothing to do with yacc -- it'

Re: Linux-2.4.4 failure to compile

2001-05-18 Thread Anuradha Ratnaweera
On Fri, 18 May 2001, Lorenzo Marcantonio wrote: > On Thu, 17 May 2001, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > > I think the header file you're talking about is the db1 header file, > > which has nothing to do with yacc -- it's the Berkeley libdb version 1, > > which is a pretty bad thing to require. > > >

Re: Linux-2.4.4 failure to compile

2001-05-17 Thread Lorenzo Marcantonio
On Thu, 17 May 2001, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > I think the header file you're talking about is the db1 header file, > which has nothing to do with yacc -- it's the Berkeley libdb version 1, > which is a pretty bad thing to require. > I've got it to compile (and apparently work) even con libdb3...

RE: Linux-2.4.4 failure to compile

2001-05-17 Thread Cress, Andrew R
Try setting CONFIG_AIC7XXX_BUILD_FIRMWARE=n as a workaround. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 2:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Linux kernel; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Linux-2.4.4 failure to compile In article

Re: Linux-2.4.4 failure to compile

2001-05-17 Thread H. Peter Anvin
"Richard B. Johnson" wrote: > > I have both. I also have `flex`, but not `lex'. `lex' is a simlink to > flex. What this compile wanted is some header files in expects for > `yacc` that are not present. And they don't come with the `bison` > distribution. Maybe they came with `yacc` years ago? Any

Re: Linux-2.4.4 failure to compile

2001-05-17 Thread Richard B. Johnson
On 17 May 2001, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > By author:Tim Hockin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > > > The aic7xxx assembler requiring libdb1 is a bungle. Getting the headers > > for that right on various distros is not easy. Add to th

Re: Linux-2.4.4 failure to compile

2001-05-17 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> By author:Tim Hockin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > The aic7xxx assembler requiring libdb1 is a bungle. Getting the headers > for that right on various distros is not easy. Add to that it requires > YACC, when most people have bison

Re: Linux-2.4.4 failure to compile

2001-05-17 Thread Christoph Hellwig
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > "Richard B. Johnson" wrote: >> >> Hello; >> >> I downloaded linux-2.4.4. The basic kernel compiles but the aic7xxx >> SCSI module that I require on some machines, doesn't. > The aic7xxx assembler requiring libdb1 is a bungle. Getting the headers > fo

Re: Linux-2.4.4 failure to compile

2001-05-17 Thread Tim Hockin
"Richard B. Johnson" wrote: > > Hello; > > I downloaded linux-2.4.4. The basic kernel compiles but the aic7xxx > SCSI module that I require on some machines, doesn't. The aic7xxx assembler requiring libdb1 is a bungle. Getting the headers for that right on various distros is not easy. Add to