From: Mark Frazer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 4:45 PM
> To: Khachaturov, Vassilii
> Cc: Linux Kernel
> Subject: Re: Makefile patch for cscope and saner Ctags
>
>
> Khachaturov, Vassilii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [01/05/31 15:00]:
>
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 4:45 PM
To: Khachaturov, Vassilii
Cc: Linux Kernel
Subject: Re: Makefile patch for cscope and saner Ctags
Khachaturov, Vassilii [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[01/05/31 15:00]:
Don't forget to bug RH package maintainer on that. Whatever
Khachaturov, Vassilii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01/05/31 15:00]:
> Don't forget to bug RH package maintainer on that. Whatever
bugzilla submitted
> I use source-built cscope v.15.1, and -k works for me here,
works for me too!
> WHY?! Isn't it better to put $(shell cat cscope.files) on the list
> From: Mark Frazer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Khachaturov, Vassilii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Great stuff. May I suggest adding -k to the cscope cmdline:
> > + cscope -b -k -I include
>
> The cscope on my RH7.0 box didn't take -k!
> [root@mjftest linux-2.4.5]# cscope -b -k -I include
>
Pete Wyckoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01/05/31 13:56]:
>
> You seem not to have read my response to your earlier mail proprosing
> such a thing (for tags only, not cscope):
>
> http://boudicca.tux.org/hypermail/linux-kernel/2001week21/1869.html
I did. I didn't want to sign up to maintain the
Khachaturov, Vassilii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01/05/31 12:12]:
> Great stuff. May I suggest adding -k to the cscope cmdline:
>
> > + cscope -b -I include
>
> should become
> + cscope -b -k -I include
The cscope on my RH7.0 box didn't take -k!
[root@mjftest linux-2.4.5]# ls -l cscope.files
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> The following patch generates saner Ctags and will build cscope
> output. It's against 2.4.5
>
> --- Makefile.old Mon May 28 22:44:01 2001
> +++ Makefile Wed May 30 17:50:01 2001
> @@ -334,11 +334,32 @@
>
> # Exuberant ctags works better with -I
> tags: dummy
Great stuff. May I suggest adding -k to the cscope cmdline:
> + cscope -b -I include
should become
+ cscope -b -k -I include
Also, I think you should separate cscope.files creation into a different
rule,
and make the cscope target depend on it and on the files in it. (Like the
stuff
Great stuff. May I suggest adding -k to the cscope cmdline:
+ cscope -b -I include
should become
+ cscope -b -k -I include
Also, I think you should separate cscope.files creation into a different
rule,
and make the cscope target depend on it and on the files in it. (Like the
stuff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The following patch generates saner Ctags and will build cscope
output. It's against 2.4.5
--- Makefile.old Mon May 28 22:44:01 2001
+++ Makefile Wed May 30 17:50:01 2001
@@ -334,11 +334,32 @@
# Exuberant ctags works better with -I
tags: dummy
-
Khachaturov, Vassilii [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01/05/31 12:12]:
Great stuff. May I suggest adding -k to the cscope cmdline:
+ cscope -b -I include
should become
+ cscope -b -k -I include
The cscope on my RH7.0 box didn't take -k!
[root@mjftest linux-2.4.5]# ls -l cscope.files
Pete Wyckoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01/05/31 13:56]:
You seem not to have read my response to your earlier mail proprosing
such a thing (for tags only, not cscope):
http://boudicca.tux.org/hypermail/linux-kernel/2001week21/1869.html
I did. I didn't want to sign up to maintain the
From: Mark Frazer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Khachaturov, Vassilii [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Great stuff. May I suggest adding -k to the cscope cmdline:
+ cscope -b -k -I include
The cscope on my RH7.0 box didn't take -k!
[root@mjftest linux-2.4.5]# cscope -b -k -I include
cscope: unknown
Khachaturov, Vassilii [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01/05/31 15:00]:
Don't forget to bug RH package maintainer on that. Whatever
bugzilla submitted
I use source-built cscope v.15.1, and -k works for me here,
works for me too!
WHY?! Isn't it better to put $(shell cat cscope.files) on the list of
I
14 matches
Mail list logo