Re: Plans for 2.5

2001-03-31 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2001-03-31T09:36:33, James Lewis Nance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > 4) What is the time frame of releasing 2.5.x-final (or 2.6.x) ? > > wow that's jumping the gun a bit. > But its easy to answer. It will come out about 1 year after whatever > target date we initially set :-) Sorry,

Re: Plans for 2.5

2001-03-31 Thread James Lewis Nance
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 07:54:44PM -0800, Joel Jaeggli wrote: > On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Hen, Shmulik wrote: > > 4) What is the time frame of releasing 2.5.x-final (or 2.6.x) ? > > wow that's jumping the gun a bit. But its easy to answer. It will come out about 1 year after whatever target date we

Re: Plans for 2.5

2001-03-31 Thread James Lewis Nance
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 07:54:44PM -0800, Joel Jaeggli wrote: On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Hen, Shmulik wrote: 4) What is the time frame of releasing 2.5.x-final (or 2.6.x) ? wow that's jumping the gun a bit. But its easy to answer. It will come out about 1 year after whatever target date we

Re: Plans for 2.5

2001-03-31 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2001-03-31T09:36:33, James Lewis Nance [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: 4) What is the time frame of releasing 2.5.x-final (or 2.6.x) ? wow that's jumping the gun a bit. But its easy to answer. It will come out about 1 year after whatever target date we initially set :-) Sorry, s/we

RE: Plans for 2.5

2001-03-30 Thread Joel Jaeggli
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Hen, Shmulik wrote: > Just some general questions: > > 1) Is there anywhere a list that describes what is intended to be in 2.5.x ? > 2) Are there any early releases of 2.5.x ? if it's anything like 2.1 or 2.3 we need a bit more 2.4 tidying till somebody decides some major

RE: Plans for 2.5

2001-03-30 Thread Joel Jaeggli
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Hen, Shmulik wrote: Just some general questions: 1) Is there anywhere a list that describes what is intended to be in 2.5.x ? 2) Are there any early releases of 2.5.x ? if it's anything like 2.1 or 2.3 we need a bit more 2.4 tidying till somebody decides some major

Re: Plans for 2.5

2001-03-29 Thread Giacomo Catenazzi
"Hen, Shmulik" wrote: > > Just some general questions: > > 1) Is there anywhere a list that describes what is intended to be in 2.5.x ? General/Big changes are discussed in: http://lwn.net/2001/0329/a/kernel-summit-agenda.php3 > 2) Are there any early releases of 2.5.x ? > 3) Are the things

RE: Plans for 2.5

2001-03-29 Thread Hen, Shmulik
Just some general questions: 1) Is there anywhere a list that describes what is intended to be in 2.5.x ? 2) Are there any early releases of 2.5.x ? 3) Are the things for 2.5.x being discussed on another mailing list ? 4) What is the time frame of releasing 2.5.x-final (or 2.6.x) ?

RE: Plans for 2.5

2001-03-29 Thread Hen, Shmulik
Just some general questions: 1) Is there anywhere a list that describes what is intended to be in 2.5.x ? 2) Are there any early releases of 2.5.x ? 3) Are the things for 2.5.x being discussed on another mailing list ? 4) What is the time frame of releasing 2.5.x-final (or 2.6.x) ?

Re: Plans for 2.5

2001-03-29 Thread Giacomo Catenazzi
"Hen, Shmulik" wrote: Just some general questions: 1) Is there anywhere a list that describes what is intended to be in 2.5.x ? General/Big changes are discussed in: http://lwn.net/2001/0329/a/kernel-summit-agenda.php3 2) Are there any early releases of 2.5.x ? 3) Are the things for

Re: Plans for 2.5

2001-03-28 Thread James Simmons
> I got some questions. When are we going to develop stuff for 2.5? What >is planed? My opinion for linux 2.5 should be performance. Since linux >already is stable or well done for nature, we could thing more on >performance to be a diferencial over others. What do you people thing? 2.5.X will

Re: Plans for 2.5

2001-03-28 Thread José Luis Domingo López
On Wednesday, 28 March 2001, at 19:44:52 -0300, Bruno Avila wrote: > Hello people, > > I got some questions. When are we going to develop stuff for 2.5? What is > planed? My opinion for linux 2.5 should be performance. Since linux already > is stable or well done for nature, we could

Re: Plans for 2.5

2001-03-28 Thread José Luis Domingo López
On Wednesday, 28 March 2001, at 19:44:52 -0300, Bruno Avila wrote: Hello people, I got some questions. When are we going to develop stuff for 2.5? What is planed? My opinion for linux 2.5 should be performance. Since linux already is stable or well done for nature, we could thing

Re: Plans for 2.5

2001-03-28 Thread James Simmons
I got some questions. When are we going to develop stuff for 2.5? What is planed? My opinion for linux 2.5 should be performance. Since linux already is stable or well done for nature, we could thing more on performance to be a diferencial over others. What do you people thing? 2.5.X will