Re: Possible patch for reiserfs-3.6.22 against 2.4.0-test12 w/ new_writepage

For Linux-2.4.0-test12 : Reiserfs-3.6.23 ftp://ftp.reiserfs.org/pub/2.4/linux-2.4.0-test12-reiserfs-3.6.23-patch.gz See the archived message regarding this release here: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=reiserfs&m=97722705425882&w=2 For Linux-2.4.0-test13-preX, the following Makefile patch is al

RE: Possible patch for reiserfs-3.6.22 against 2.4.0-test12

t cannot be done. == - Mensaje original - De: "Carlos E. Gorges" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Para: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Enviado: miércoles, 13 de diciembre de 2000 14:14 Asunto: Re: Possible patch for reiserfs-3.6.22 against 2.4.0-test12 > > Hiya. > > > > The latest rei

Re: Possible patch for reiserfs-3.6.22 against 2.4.0-test12

> Hiya. > > The latest reiserfs patch on ftp.namesys.com causes compilation errors > against test12 due to the task queue changes. Does this look correct? > Please, somebody can test this patch -- BOF -- diff -ur linux-bk/fs/reiserfs/journal.c linux/fs/reiserfs/journal.c --- linux-bk/fs/reiser

Re: Possible patch for reiserfs-3.6.22 against 2.4.0-test12

Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Your patch will probably let journal.c get compiled, but it might be > dangerous to use considering what Chris said. I've just tried it and got filesystem corruption, so no, it doesn't work. I'll wait for someone else to provide a patch that works. --

Re: Possible patch for reiserfs-3.6.22 against 2.4.0-test12

Adam Sampson wrote: >The latest reiserfs patch on ftp.namesys.com causes compilation errors >against test12 due to the task queue changes. Does this look correct? [patch snipped] > >It does at least compile with these changes, but I haven't yet tested >it. Looking at run_task_queue, it would appe