Re: Problem with inotify

On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, John McCutchan wrote: > On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 06:06:56PM +0100, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > > On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, John McCutchan wrote: > > > On Mon, 4 Jul 2005, John McCutchan wrote: > > > > Nice work, I am going to have a closer look at the patch soon. Could you > > > >

Re: Problem with inotify

On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 06:06:56PM +0100, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, John McCutchan wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 08:56:15AM +0100, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > > > On Mon, 4 Jul 2005, John McCutchan wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2005-07-04 at 20:09 +0100, Anton Altaparmakov

Re: Problem with inotify

On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, John McCutchan wrote: > On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 08:56:15AM +0100, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > > On Mon, 4 Jul 2005, John McCutchan wrote: > > > On Mon, 2005-07-04 at 20:09 +0100, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > > > > On Mon, 4 Jul 2005, Daniel Drake wrote: > > > > > Anton

Re: Problem with inotify

On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 08:56:15AM +0100, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > On Mon, 4 Jul 2005, John McCutchan wrote: > > On Mon, 2005-07-04 at 20:09 +0100, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > > > On Mon, 4 Jul 2005, Daniel Drake wrote: > > > > Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > > > > > )-: I have addressed the only

Re: Problem with inotify

On Mon, 4 Jul 2005, John McCutchan wrote: > On Mon, 2005-07-04 at 20:09 +0100, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > > On Mon, 4 Jul 2005, Daniel Drake wrote: > > > Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > > > > )-: I have addressed the only things I can think off that could cause > > > > the oops and below is the

Re: Problem with inotify

On Mon, 4 Jul 2005, John McCutchan wrote: On Mon, 2005-07-04 at 20:09 +0100, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: On Mon, 4 Jul 2005, Daniel Drake wrote: Anton Altaparmakov wrote: )-: I have addressed the only things I can think off that could cause the oops and below is the resulting patch.

Re: Problem with inotify

On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 08:56:15AM +0100, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: On Mon, 4 Jul 2005, John McCutchan wrote: On Mon, 2005-07-04 at 20:09 +0100, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: On Mon, 4 Jul 2005, Daniel Drake wrote: Anton Altaparmakov wrote: )-: I have addressed the only things I can

Re: Problem with inotify

On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, John McCutchan wrote: On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 08:56:15AM +0100, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: On Mon, 4 Jul 2005, John McCutchan wrote: On Mon, 2005-07-04 at 20:09 +0100, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: On Mon, 4 Jul 2005, Daniel Drake wrote: Anton Altaparmakov wrote:

Re: Problem with inotify

On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 06:06:56PM +0100, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, John McCutchan wrote: On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 08:56:15AM +0100, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: On Mon, 4 Jul 2005, John McCutchan wrote: On Mon, 2005-07-04 at 20:09 +0100, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: On

Re: Problem with inotify

On Mon, 2005-07-04 at 20:09 +0100, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > On Mon, 4 Jul 2005, Daniel Drake wrote: > > Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > > > )-: I have addressed the only things I can think off that could cause > > > the oops and below is the resulting patch. Could you please test it? > > > >

Re: Problem with inotify

On Mon, 4 Jul 2005, Daniel Drake wrote: > Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > > )-: I have addressed the only things I can think off that could cause > > the oops and below is the resulting patch. Could you please test it? > > Yeah!! After removing I_WILL_FREE stuff, that fixed both the oops *and* the

Re: Problem with inotify

Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > )-: I have addressed the only things I can think off that could cause > the oops and below is the resulting patch. Could you please test it? Yeah!! After removing I_WILL_FREE stuff, that fixed both the oops *and* the hang. Everything works nicely now. Thanks a

RE: Problem with inotify

Gautam, On Mon, 2005-07-04 at 11:55 -0400, Gautam Singaraju wrote: > I had used the 2.6.12 kernel with the latest Inotify. There was no > "I_WILL_FREE" in the any place. And, there was no problem in compilation. Er, yes, obviously. You are not using my patch on top of inotify and original

RE: Problem with inotify

ks, Gautam Singaraju SIS Dept., UNC Charlotte -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anton Altaparmakov Sent: Monday, July 04, 2005 11:12 AM To: Daniel Drake Cc: David Gómez; Robert Love; John McCutchan; Linux-kernel Subject: Re: Problem with inoti

Re: Problem with inotify

On Mon, 2005-07-04 at 15:39 +0100, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > On Mon, 2005-07-04 at 15:27 +0100, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > > On Sun, 2005-07-03 at 11:34 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote: > > > I reverted the patch you sent earlier > > > (inotify_unmount_inodes-list-iteration-fix.diff) and applied the

Re: Problem with inotify

On Mon, 2005-07-04 at 15:27 +0100, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > On Sun, 2005-07-03 at 11:34 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote: > > I reverted the patch you sent earlier > > (inotify_unmount_inodes-list-iteration-fix.diff) and applied the one you > > attached here

Re: Problem with inotify

On Sun, 2005-07-03 at 11:34 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote: > I reverted the patch you sent earlier > (inotify_unmount_inodes-list-iteration-fix.diff) and applied the one you > attached here (inotify_unmount_inodes-list-iteration-fix2.diff). > > The good news is that the hang is gone. The bad news is

Re: Problem with inotify

On Sun, 2005-07-03 at 11:34 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote: I reverted the patch you sent earlier (inotify_unmount_inodes-list-iteration-fix.diff) and applied the one you attached here (inotify_unmount_inodes-list-iteration-fix2.diff). The good news is that the hang is gone. The bad news is that

Re: Problem with inotify

On Mon, 2005-07-04 at 15:27 +0100, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: On Sun, 2005-07-03 at 11:34 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote: I reverted the patch you sent earlier (inotify_unmount_inodes-list-iteration-fix.diff) and applied the one you attached here (inotify_unmount_inodes-list-iteration-fix2.diff).

Re: Problem with inotify

On Mon, 2005-07-04 at 15:39 +0100, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: On Mon, 2005-07-04 at 15:27 +0100, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: On Sun, 2005-07-03 at 11:34 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote: I reverted the patch you sent earlier (inotify_unmount_inodes-list-iteration-fix.diff) and applied the one you

RE: Problem with inotify

Singaraju SIS Dept., UNC Charlotte -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anton Altaparmakov Sent: Monday, July 04, 2005 11:12 AM To: Daniel Drake Cc: David Gómez; Robert Love; John McCutchan; Linux-kernel Subject: Re: Problem with inotify On Mon

RE: Problem with inotify

Gautam, On Mon, 2005-07-04 at 11:55 -0400, Gautam Singaraju wrote: I had used the 2.6.12 kernel with the latest Inotify. There was no I_WILL_FREE in the any place. And, there was no problem in compilation. Er, yes, obviously. You are not using my patch on top of inotify and original inotify

Re: Problem with inotify

Anton Altaparmakov wrote: )-: I have addressed the only things I can think off that could cause the oops and below is the resulting patch. Could you please test it? Yeah!! After removing I_WILL_FREE stuff, that fixed both the oops *and* the hang. Everything works nicely now. Thanks a

Re: Problem with inotify

On Mon, 4 Jul 2005, Daniel Drake wrote: Anton Altaparmakov wrote: )-: I have addressed the only things I can think off that could cause the oops and below is the resulting patch. Could you please test it? Yeah!! After removing I_WILL_FREE stuff, that fixed both the oops *and* the hang.

Re: Problem with inotify

On Mon, 2005-07-04 at 20:09 +0100, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: On Mon, 4 Jul 2005, Daniel Drake wrote: Anton Altaparmakov wrote: )-: I have addressed the only things I can think off that could cause the oops and below is the resulting patch. Could you please test it? Yeah!! After