RE: Re: [PATCH] cfi: fix deadloop in cfi_cmdset_0002.c do_write_buffer

2019-02-13 Thread liujian (CE)
il.com; rich...@nod.at; > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; joakim.tjernl...@infinera.com; > linux-...@lists.infradead.org; computersforpe...@gmail.com; > dw...@infradead.org; liujian (CE) ; > ikegami...@yahoo.co.jp > Subject: RE: Re: [PATCH] cfi: fix deadloop in cfi_cmdset_0002.c > do_write_buf

RE: Re: [PATCH] cfi: fix deadloop in cfi_cmdset_0002.c do_write_buffer

2019-02-08 Thread Tokunori Ikegami
inera.com; > linux-...@lists.infradead.org; computersforpe...@gmail.com; > dw...@infradead.org; Liu Jian > Subject: RE: Re: [PATCH] cfi: fix deadloop in cfi_cmdset_0002.c > do_write_buffer > > Hi Ikegami, > > I have seen a case myself where a value was written, chip chan

Re: Re: [PATCH] cfi: fix deadloop in cfi_cmdset_0002.c do_write_buffer

2019-02-08 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
On Thu, 2019-02-07 at 23:50 +, Sobon, Przemyslaw wrote: > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click > links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the > content is safe. > > > Hi Ikegami, > > I have seen a case myself where a value

RE: Re: [PATCH] cfi: fix deadloop in cfi_cmdset_0002.c do_write_buffer

2019-02-07 Thread Sobon, Przemyslaw
Hi Ikegami, I have seen a case myself where a value was written, chip changed state to "ready" but when I was reading the value was incorrect. This can happen as result of intermittent issue with flash. It is hard to fall into scenario when testing on limited number of devices but with large enoug