ger.kernel.org; linux...@openeuler.org;
> linux-m...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: RE: Re: [PATCH for-next 00/32] spin lock usage optimization for SCSI
> drivers
>
> On Fri, 12 Feb 2021, Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) wrote:
>
> >
> > > -Original Message-
>
m;
> > martin.peter...@oracle.com; linux-s...@vger.kernel.org;
> > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux...@openeuler.org;
> > linux-m...@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: RE: Re: [PATCH for-next 00/32] spin lock usage optimization for
> > SCSI
> > drive
ger.kernel.org; linux...@openeuler.org;
> linux-m...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: RE: Re: [PATCH for-next 00/32] spin lock usage optimization for SCSI
> drivers
>
>
> On Thu, 11 Feb 2021, Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) wrote:
>
> >
> > Actually in m68k, I also saw its IR
On Thu, 11 Feb 2021, Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) wrote:
>
> Actually in m68k, I also saw its IRQ entry disabled interrupts by
> ' move#0x2700,%sr /* disable intrs */'
>
> arch/m68k/include/asm/entry.h:
>
> .macro SAVE_ALL_SYS
> move#0x2700,%sr /* disabl
> >
> > On Wed, 10 Feb 2021, Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) wrote:
> >
> > > > On Wed, 10 Feb 2021, Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, 10 Feb 2021, Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > There is no warning from m68k builds. That's because
> > > > > > > >
5 matches
Mail list logo
