* Venki Pallipadi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Can you check the test patch below (over latest git) and let me know whether
> it
> resolves the issue.
>
the patch fixes the issue for me,
thanks a lot.
Eric
> Enable C3 without bm control only for CST based C3.
>
> Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pall
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 05:38:08PM +0200, Eric Sesterhenn / Snakebyte wrote:
> * Pallipadi, Venkatesh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > This means things should work fine with processor.max_cstate=2 boot
> > option
> > as well. Can you please double check that.
>
> yes, system boots fine with this ke
* Pallipadi, Venkatesh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> This means things should work fine with processor.max_cstate=2 boot
> option
> as well. Can you please double check that.
yes, system boots fine with this kernel parameter
> Also, please send in the acpidump from your system.
here we go, if you
olnierkiewicz; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ingo
>Molnar; Thomas Gleixner; Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>Subject: Re: Time Problems with 2.6.23-rc1-gf695baf2
>
>* Michal Piotrowski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> On 26/07/07, Eric Sesterhenn / Snakebyte <[EMAIL PROTECT
* Michal Piotrowski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On 26/07/07, Eric Sesterhenn / Snakebyte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * Len Brown ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > > > > > [ 13.506890] ACPI Exception (processor_throttling-0084):
> > > > > > > AE_NOT_FOUND, Evaluating _PTC [200701
Hi Eric,
On 26/07/07, Eric Sesterhenn / Snakebyte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Len Brown ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > > > > [ 13.506890] ACPI Exception (processor_throttling-0084):
> > > > > > AE_NOT_FOUND, Evaluating _PTC [20070126]
> > > > > > [ 13.507101] ACPI Exception (processor_th
* Len Brown ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > > > [ 13.506890] ACPI Exception (processor_throttling-0084):
> > > > > AE_NOT_FOUND, Evaluating _PTC [20070126]
> > > > > [ 13.507101] ACPI Exception (processor_throttling-0147):
> > > > > AE_NOT_FOUND, Evaluating _TSS [20070126]
>
> Note that the
On Wednesday 25 July 2007 07:33, Eric Sesterhenn / Snakebyte wrote:
> * Michal Piotrowski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On 24/07/07, Eric Sesterhenn / Snakebyte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > see second 13 to 510, after pressing it about ten
> > > times, it continues booting.
> >
> > Probing
* Michal Piotrowski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On 24/07/07, Eric Sesterhenn / Snakebyte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > see second 13 to 510, after pressing it about ten
> > times, it continues booting.
>
> Probing IDE interface...
>
> [ 13.867939] VP_IDE: VIA vt82c686a (rev 22) IDE UDMA66
On Wednesday 25 July 2007, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wednesday 25 July 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 24/07/07, Eric Sesterhenn / Snakebyte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > hi,
> > >
> > > seems like the clock got screwed or something similar. During boot
10 matches
Mail list logo