RE: chelsio: Use a more common const struct pci_device_id foo[] style

2015-02-16 Thread Casey Leedom
Leedom Cc: Hariprasad S; James E.J. Bottomley; net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-scsi; David Miller Subject: Re: chelsio: Use a more common const struct pci_device_id foo[] style On Mon, 2015-02-16 at 19:07 +, Casey Leedom wrote: > I understand that OS-indepe

Re: chelsio: Use a more common const struct pci_device_id foo[] style

2015-02-16 Thread Joe Perches
On Mon, 2015-02-16 at 19:07 +, Casey Leedom wrote: > I understand that OS-independence issues aren't something which are > normally accommodated, but as long as definitions don't introduce > unnecessary "foreign intrusion" I would hope that it would be okay. > As I noted, our t4_regs.h file

RE: chelsio: Use a more common const struct pci_device_id foo[] style

2015-02-16 Thread Casey Leedom
moron today.) Casey From: Joe Perches [j...@perches.com] Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 10:21 AM To: Casey Leedom Cc: Hariprasad S; James E.J. Bottomley; net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-scsi; David Miller Subject: Re: chelsio: Use

Re: chelsio: Use a more common const struct pci_device_id foo[] style

2015-02-16 Thread Joe Perches
On Mon, 2015-02-16 at 18:05 +, Casey Leedom wrote: > I can't quite tell if this is a patch request being sent to > netdev/David Miller or if it's a suggestion sent to Chelsio that you'd > like Chelsio to adopt. I ~think~ it's the latter because the subject > doesn't include the standard

RE: chelsio: Use a more common const struct pci_device_id foo[] style

2015-02-16 Thread Casey Leedom
I can't quite tell if this is a patch request being sent to netdev/David Miller or if it's a suggestion sent to Chelsio that you'd like Chelsio to adopt. I ~think~ it's the latter because the subject doesn't include the standard formatting for a patch request but I'm not 100% familiar with

Re: chelsio: Use a more common const struct pci_device_id foo[] style

2015-02-16 Thread Joe Perches
On Mon, 2015-02-16 at 19:07 +, Casey Leedom wrote: I understand that OS-independence issues aren't something which are normally accommodated, but as long as definitions don't introduce unnecessary foreign intrusion I would hope that it would be okay. As I noted, our t4_regs.h file is

RE: chelsio: Use a more common const struct pci_device_id foo[] style

2015-02-16 Thread Casey Leedom
From: Joe Perches [j...@perches.com] Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 10:21 AM To: Casey Leedom Cc: Hariprasad S; James E.J. Bottomley; net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-scsi; David Miller Subject: Re: chelsio: Use a more common const

RE: chelsio: Use a more common const struct pci_device_id foo[] style

2015-02-16 Thread Casey Leedom
I can't quite tell if this is a patch request being sent to netdev/David Miller or if it's a suggestion sent to Chelsio that you'd like Chelsio to adopt. I ~think~ it's the latter because the subject doesn't include the standard formatting for a patch request but I'm not 100% familiar with

Re: chelsio: Use a more common const struct pci_device_id foo[] style

2015-02-16 Thread Joe Perches
On Mon, 2015-02-16 at 18:05 +, Casey Leedom wrote: I can't quite tell if this is a patch request being sent to netdev/David Miller or if it's a suggestion sent to Chelsio that you'd like Chelsio to adopt. I ~think~ it's the latter because the subject doesn't include the standard

RE: chelsio: Use a more common const struct pci_device_id foo[] style

2015-02-16 Thread Casey Leedom
: Hariprasad S; James E.J. Bottomley; net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-scsi; David Miller Subject: Re: chelsio: Use a more common const struct pci_device_id foo[] style On Mon, 2015-02-16 at 19:07 +, Casey Leedom wrote: I understand that OS-independence issues aren't