RE: discrepancy while save and restore of debounce registers

On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 21:44:56, Hunter, Jon wrote: > Hi Gururaja, > > On 10/18/2012 12:31 AM, Hebbar, Gururaja wrote: > > Jon, > > > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 02:42:01, Hunter, Jon wrote: > > [snip] > > >>> My doubt/questions are > >>> 1. Why should debounce registers be updated only when it'

Re: discrepancy while save and restore of debounce registers

Hi Gururaja, On 10/18/2012 12:31 AM, Hebbar, Gururaja wrote: > Jon, > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 02:42:01, Hunter, Jon wrote: [snip] >>> My doubt/questions are >>> 1. Why should debounce registers be updated only when it's accessed >>> previously? >> >> If debounce is not being used by any of t

RE: discrepancy while save and restore of debounce registers

Jon, On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 02:42:01, Hunter, Jon wrote: > Hi Gururaja, > > On 10/17/2012 01:13 AM, Hebbar, Gururaja wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I came across a peculiar issue while updating GPIO debounce registers on > > OMAP platform. > > > > According to mainline commit ae547354a8ed59f19b57f7e1d

Re: discrepancy while save and restore of debounce registers

Hi Gururaja, On 10/17/2012 01:13 AM, Hebbar, Gururaja wrote: > Hi, > > I came across a peculiar issue while updating GPIO debounce registers on > OMAP platform. > > According to mainline commit ae547354a8ed59f19b57f7e1de9c7816edfc3537 > > gpio/omap: save and restore debounce registers > > GPIO