Re: intel etherpro100 on 2.2.18p21 vs 2.2.18p17

2000-11-17 Thread Andrey Savochkin
Hello, On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 05:18:25PM -0500, Dennis wrote: > There is a flaw in the eepro100 driver that apparently doesnt initialise > something properly. The problem is exasperated by the fact that the If one want to say it politely, the driver and the hardware sometimes disagree about t

RE: intel etherpro100 on 2.2.18p21 vs 2.2.18p17

2000-11-14 Thread Dennis
At 12:15 PM 11/11/2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >We have the SUPER 370DL3 SuperMicro boards w/ the integrated Intel NIC, >unfortunately a warm boot does not help. The problem also seems to happen >when I turn on the alias ip feature in the kernel under network options. > > >On Fri, 10 Nov 2000,

Re: intel etherpro100 on 2.2.18p21 vs 2.2.18p17

2000-11-13 Thread Andrey Savochkin
Hello, On Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 04:24:12PM -0800, Allen, David B wrote: > FWIW, I have a dual-proc SuperMicro motherboard P3DM3 with integrated > Adaptec SCSI and Intel 8255x built-in NIC. > > Sometimes on a cold boot I get the "kernel: eth0: card reports no RX > buffers" that repeats, but if I f

RE: intel etherpro100 on 2.2.18p21 vs 2.2.18p17

2000-11-11 Thread michael
We have the SUPER 370DL3 SuperMicro boards w/ the integrated Intel NIC, unfortunately a warm boot does not help. The problem also seems to happen when I turn on the alias ip feature in the kernel under network options. On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, Allen, David B wrote: > FWIW, I have a dual-proc Super

RE: intel etherpro100 on 2.2.18p21 vs 2.2.18p17

2000-11-10 Thread Allen, David B
FWIW, I have a dual-proc SuperMicro motherboard P3DM3 with integrated Adaptec SCSI and Intel 8255x built-in NIC. Sometimes on a cold boot I get the "kernel: eth0: card reports no RX buffers" that repeats, but if I follow it with a warm boot the message doesn't appear (even on subsequent warm boot