On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:48:02PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 13:42 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > Either is fine with me, I can revert it, or apply a fix, which ever you
> > want, just let me know.
>
> Well, a proper fix would make this whole episode worthwhile. But if I
> can't
On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 13:42 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> Either is fine with me, I can revert it, or apply a fix, which ever you
> want, just let me know.
Well, a proper fix would make this whole episode worthwhile. But if I
can't come up with anything that actually builds in a day or two it'll
have to
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:21:28PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> Greg,
>
> On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 12:14 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > I must have compile tested this with CONFIG_LIB80211_CRYPT_TKIP=m while
> > the code checks for CONFIG_LIB80211_CRYPT_TKIP only (ie, builtin only).
> > I'll have to have
Greg,
On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 12:14 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> I must have compile tested this with CONFIG_LIB80211_CRYPT_TKIP=m while
> the code checks for CONFIG_LIB80211_CRYPT_TKIP only (ie, builtin only).
> I'll have to have a better look at this.
>
> Greg, can the cleaning up of this mess invo
Hi Paul,
On Wed, 28 May 2014 11:57:21 +0200 Paul Bolle wrote:
>
> That may be related to my "staging: rtl8192u: rename
> CONFIG_IEEE80211_CRYPT_TKIP" (see https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/26/531 .)
> My message states it was compile tested, but that would be on x86_64.
> Did it only break on powerpc
On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 11:57 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 19:46 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> That may be related to my "staging: rtl8192u: rename
> CONFIG_IEEE80211_CRYPT_TKIP" (see https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/26/531 .)
> My message states it was compile tested, but that wou
On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 19:46 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/ieee80211_tx.c:203:34: error: 'struct
> ieee80211_hdr' has no member named 'addr1'
>
Hi Andrew,
On Mon, 7 Apr 2014 11:26:54 -0700 Andrew Morton
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 7 Apr 2014 14:52:42 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>
> > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > allyesconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c: In function 'ocfs2_block_gr
On Mon, 7 Apr 2014 14:52:42 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c: In function 'ocfs2_block_group_set_bits':
> fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c:1357:2: error: implicit declaration
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 05:20:35PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/debugfs.c: In function
> 'iwl_dbgfs_fw_error_dump_release':
> drivers/net/wireles
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/debugfs.c: In function
> 'iwl_dbgfs_fw_error_dump_release':
> drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/debugfs.c:161:2: error: implicit declaration
> of
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 18:27:52 +1100
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> net/netfilter/nft_hash.c: In function 'nft_hash_tbl_free':
> net/netfilter/nft_hash.c:79:3: error: implicit declaration of function
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 21:21:00 +1100
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/built-in.o:(.data+0x1868): multiple
> definition of `i40e_ptype_lookup'
> drivers/net/ethernet/i
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014, 3:16 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>
> > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > allyesconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > drivers/gpio/gpio-zevio.c: In function 'zevio_gpio_port_get':
> >
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-zevio.c: In function 'zevio_gpio_port_get':
> drivers/gpio/gpio-zevio.c:70:2: error: implicit declaration of function
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 01:40:57PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Josh,
>
> On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 18:21:29 -0800 Josh Triplett
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:00:26AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Please check the build results overnight tonight (for next-20140227 at
> > >
Hi Josh,
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 18:21:29 -0800 Josh Triplett wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:00:26AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Please check the build results overnight tonight (for next-20140227 at
> > http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/linux-next) and submit any more fixes for
> > the alln
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:00:26AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Please check the build results overnight tonight (for next-20140227 at
> http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/linux-next) and submit any more fixes for
> the allnoconfig build errors.
Checking that site, I don't see any other instances of
Hi Josh,
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 15:19:16 -0800 Josh Triplett wrote:
>
> Please also fold in my patch "ia64: select CONFIG_TTY for use of
> tty_write_message in unaligned". (Just bounced you a copy.)
Done.
> There's an s390 issue as well which needs the same fix (make the
> top-level architecture
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:00:26AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Josh,
>
> On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 02:02:34 -0800 Josh Triplett
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 07:16:27PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >
> > > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc64
> >
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 10:00:26 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
> Hi Josh,
>
> On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 02:02:34 -0800 Josh Triplett
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 07:16:27PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >
> > > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc64
> > > al
Hi Josh,
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 02:02:34 -0800 Josh Triplett wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 07:16:27PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc64
> > allnoconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > arch/powerpc/kernel/built-in.o: In function
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 07:16:27PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc64
> allnoconfig) failed like this:
>
> arch/powerpc/kernel/built-in.o: In function `.machine_check_queue_event':
> (.text+0x11260): undefined reference t
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 04:25:00PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc defconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> arch/sparc/kernel/sun4m_irq.c: In function 'sun4m_build_device_irq':
> arch/sparc/kernel/sun4m_irq.c:266:2: error: impli
Hi Tejun.
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 09:27:00AM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 09:47:43PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi, Tejun,
> >
> > On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 01:39:33 -0500 Tejun Heo wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 04:25:00PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 09:47:43PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi, Tejun,
>
> On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 01:39:33 -0500 Tejun Heo wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 04:25:00PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Presumably caused by commit 2bd59d48ebfb ("cgroup: convert to kernfs")
> > > (see
Hi, Tejun,
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 01:39:33 -0500 Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 04:25:00PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Presumably caused by commit 2bd59d48ebfb ("cgroup: convert to kernfs")
> > (see the comment in commit 1ff6bbfd13ca ("arm, pm, vmpressure: add
> > missing slab.h
Hello,
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 04:25:00PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Presumably caused by commit 2bd59d48ebfb ("cgroup: convert to kernfs")
> (see the comment in commit 1ff6bbfd13ca ("arm, pm, vmpressure: add
> missing slab.h includes")). I wonder how mane more builds are broken by
> this :
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 03:54:12PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c: In function '_rtw_init_mlme_priv':
> drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_
On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 20:28 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S: Assembler messages:
> arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S:1312: Error: attempt to m
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 17. Dezember 2013, 06:59:56 schrieb Stephen Rothwell:
> Caused by commit 34ef6d7fe467 ("rtc: add hym8563 rtc-driver") from the
> akpm-current tree. Probably some missing include(s).
>
> I just reverted that commit for today.
The includes are fine, I just seem to have forgotten
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 12:33:01 + Mark Brown wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 01:13:41PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>
> > Thanks for applying the patch. The commit introducing error was picked
> > up by Andrew to MM tree and lately got merged to Linus' tree:
> > https://git.kernel.org/c
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 01:13:41PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Thanks for applying the patch. The commit introducing error was picked
> up by Andrew to MM tree and lately got merged to Linus' tree:
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=8d2763770c34e8e
Hi,
On Mon, 2013-12-16 at 11:45 +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 08:08:34AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>
> > I sent a fix for this already on last Wednesday but I forgot to put you
> > on as recipient.
> > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1612360
> > Fix is need
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 08:08:34AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> I sent a fix for this already on last Wednesday but I forgot to put you
> on as recipient.
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1612360
> Fix is needed also for clock driver and on Saturday Rashika Kheria
> posted simil
Hi,
I sent a fix for this already on last Wednesday but I forgot to put you
on as recipient.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1612360
Fix is needed also for clock driver and on Saturday Rashika Kheria
posted similar patch.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
On Mon, 2013-12-16 at 16:47 +1100, Ste
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 03:02:01PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
Can you please update the contact list for the ASoC tree to use
broo...@kernel.org instead of broo...@linaro.org?
sig
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 03:02:01PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Caused by commit 436aa86f0414 ("ASoC: eukrea-tlv320: Add DT support")
> from the sound-asoc tree.
Dropped for tomorrow.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov"
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 10:49:41 +0200 (EET)
> Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64 defconfig)
>> failed like this:
>>
>> arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c: In function 'pte_alloc_one':
>> arch/sparc/mm/init_64.
Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64 defconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c: In function 'pte_alloc_one':
> arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c:2568:9: error: unused variable 'pte'
> [-Werror=unused-variable]
>
> Caused by
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 05:52:51PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Caused by commit fc1a38653793 ("ASoC: Add pinctrl PM to components of
> active DAIs") from the sound-asoc tree.
> I have reverted that commit for today.
Thanks, I'd already reverted it in my tree after a report from Fengguang
bu
On 10/29/2013 10:25 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
I have applied the following patch for today (it should go into the gpio
tree if it is considered correct):
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 20:05:12 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] gp
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Caused by commit 79a9becda894 ("gpiolib: export descriptor-based GPIO
> interface") from the gpio tree.
>
> I have applied this fix up patch for today:
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell
> Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 01:06:23 +1100
> Subject: [PATCH]
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
> I have applied the following patch for today (it should go into the gpio
> tree if it is considered correct):
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell
> Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 20:05:12 +1100
> Subject: [PATCH] gpiolib: include gpio/consumer.h in of_
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>
>> drivers/built-in.o: In function `mmc_gpio_request_cd':
>> clkdev.c:(.text+0x75c3c): undefined reference to `devm_gpio_request_one'
>>
>> CONFIG_GPIO_DEVRES is not defined for
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `mmc_gpio_request_cd':
> clkdev.c:(.text+0x75c3c): undefined reference to `devm_gpio_request_one'
>
> CONFIG_GPIO_DEVRES is not defined for this build. I am not sure what
> made the above error show up,
On 28/10/13 16:23, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc44x_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/video/xilinxfb.c: In function 'xilinxfb_of_probe':
> drivers/video/xilinxfb.c:431:30: error: 'op' undeclared (first use in thi
Hi all,
On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:33:33 -0700 Greg KH wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 09:05:37AM -0700, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 01:33:17AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >
> > > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > > allyesconfig) fai
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 09:05:37AM -0700, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 01:33:17AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > allyesconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 01:33:17AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c: In function 'xuartps_clk_notifier_cb':
> drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c:436
At Tue, 29 Oct 2013 01:42:34 +1100,
Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (i386 defconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> sound/built-in.o: In function `snd_free_dev_iram':
> (.text+0x17028): undefined reference to `gen_pool_free'
>
> Presumably
On Mon, Oct 28 2013 at 10:33am -0400,
Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/md/dm-cache-policy-hints.c: In function 'alloc_hash':
> drivers/md/dm-cache-policy-hints.c:94:2: error: impli
On 10/28/2013 03:33 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c: In function 'xuartps_clk_notifier_cb':
> drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c:436:7: error: 'PRE_RA
On 10/28/2013 03:23 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc44x_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/video/xilinxfb.c: In function 'xilinxfb_of_probe':
> drivers/video/xilinxfb.c:431:30: error: 'op' undeclared (first use i
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 06:48:04PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/misc/mic/card/mic_x100.c: In function 'mic_init':
> drivers/misc/mic/card/mic_x100.c:215:9: error: implicit
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 06:21:17PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dw.c: In function 'dw8250_probe':
> drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dw.c:341:3: error: to
Hi Stephen,
On Fri, Sep 27 2013, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c: In function 'esdhc_of_set_clock':
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c:230:10: error: 'host_clock' undeclared
> (first use in this function)
>clock, host_clock / pre_div / div);
Sorry about that. I'
On 09/03/2013 04:04 AM, Russell King wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 06:18:24PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (arm defconfig)
>> failed like this:
>>
>> arch/arm/kernel/built-in.o: In function `setup_arch':
>> io.c:(.init.tex
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 06:18:24PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (arm defconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> arch/arm/kernel/built-in.o: In function `setup_arch':
> io.c:(.init.text+0x594): undefined reference to `erratum_a15_79818
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Rothwell [mailto:s...@canb.auug.org.au]
> Sent: Monday, September 02, 2013 5:01 AM
> To: Dave Airlie
> Cc: linux-n...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Deucher,
> Alexander
> Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
On Mon, 2013-09-02 at 19:11 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/net/vxlan.c: In function 'vxlan6_xmit_skb':
> drivers/net/vxlan.c:1441:3: error: implicit declaration of function
Hey Dwight,
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 02:30:04PM +0800, Jeremy Kerr wrote:
> > Yes, I agree. The other filesystems that take an Opt_uid as well do use
> > current_user_ns() and not init_user_ns. They also do a uid_valid()
> > check and fail the mount (or fallback to GLOBAL_ROOT_UID). So I think
> >
Hey Stephen,
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:22:46AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 14:28:44 -0500 Ben Myers wrote:
> > I'd prefer not to break Stephen's tree two days in a row. We could just
> > revert
> > d6970d4b726c in the xfs tree for the time being as Stephen has done, bu
Hi all,
> Yes, I agree. The other filesystems that take an Opt_uid as well do use
> current_user_ns() and not init_user_ns. They also do a uid_valid()
> check and fail the mount (or fallback to GLOBAL_ROOT_UID). So I think
> that would look like this:
Looks good to me. Builds and mounts as expect
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 22:46:30 +0200
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 August 2013, Dwight Engen wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/inode.c
> > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/inode.c index f390042..90fb308
> > 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/inode.c
> >
Hi Ben,
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 14:28:44 -0500 Ben Myers wrote:
>
> I'd prefer not to break Stephen's tree two days in a row. We could just
> revert
> d6970d4b726c in the xfs tree for the time being as Stephen has done, but given
> the choice would prefer the fix. Do you have a preference between
On Tuesday 20 August 2013, Dwight Engen wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/inode.c
> b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/inode.c
> index f390042..90fb308 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/inode.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/inode.c
> @@ -620,12 +62
Hi Jeremy,
Apologies for breaking your build...
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 12:07:02PM -0400, Dwight Engen wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 17:20:52 +1000
> Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > allyesconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > arch/power
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 17:20:52 +1000
Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/inode.c: In function
> 'spufs_parse_options':
> arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/inod
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 09:52:53PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 9:51 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 02:48:03PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 06:17:19PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > Af
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 9:51 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 02:48:03PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 06:17:19PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
>> > allyescon
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 02:48:03PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 06:17:19PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > allyesconfig)
> > failed like this:
> >
> > drivers/usb/phy/phy-am335
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 06:17:19PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> drivers/usb/phy/phy-am335x-control.c: In function 'am335x_control_usb_probe':
> drivers/usb/phy/phy-am335x-con
On 07/29/13 at 12:47am, David Miller wrote:
> From: Stephen Rothwell
> Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 16:25:44 +1000
>
> > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> Sorry about that.
>
> > I added this commit:
>
> Applied, thanks Stephen.
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 16:25:44 +1000
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
Sorry about that.
> I added this commit:
Applied, thanks Stephen.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-
HI Mark,
On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 11:02:37 +0100 Mark Brown wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 01:52:53PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> What goes into the final tree that might cause such b
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 01:52:53PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
What goes into the final tree that might cause such breakage that didn't
appear in the earlier merges or is this additional testing
Hello Stephen, (actually a greeting this time!)
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 01:41:24PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allnoconfig) failed like this:
>
> fs/aio.c: In function 'aio_migratepage':
> fs/aio.c:196:2: error: i
Hi Mauro,
On Mon, 8 Jul 2013 09:58:19 -0300 (BRT) Mauro Carvalho Chehab
wrote:
>
> I'll wait for tomorrow's next to see if everything is ok, before sending a
> new pull request.
Looks good today.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwells...@canb.auug.org.au
pgppHB6oWi8DO.pgp
Descrip
On Mon, 8 Jul 2013, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build
(powerpc_ppc44x_defconfig) failed like this:
arch/powerpc/boot/wrapper: line 314: .../scripts/mkuboot.sh: Permission denied
Caused by commit cda2bf15f6dc ("Update email to m.che...@samsu
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 17:48:22 +1000
> I cherry-picked the commit 419076f59fc5 ("net: lls fix build with
> allnoconfig") out of tomorrow's net-next tree. (I am feeling generous
> and noticed that patch being applied :-))
Thank you :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send
On 03/07/2013 10:48, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allnoconfig) failed like this:
fs/select.c: In function 'do_select':
fs/select.c:408:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'll_start_time'
[-Werror=implicit-function-decla
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allnoconfig) failed like this:
[...]
> Caused by commit 1bc2774d8664 ("net: convert lls to use time_in_range()")
> from the net-next tree.
>
> I cherry-picked the
From: Alexey Brodkin
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 08:07:37 +
> On 06/26/2013 11:56 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
>> allyesconfig) failed like this:
> []
>> Caused by commit e4f2379db6c6 ("ethernet/arc/arc_emac - Add new
On 06/26/2013 11:56 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
[]
> Caused by commit e4f2379db6c6 ("ethernet/arc/arc_emac - Add new driver")
> from the net-next tree.
>
> I have reverted that commit for
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 08:22:49AM +0800, Peng Tao wrote:
> On 06/25/2013 07:50 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> >On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 09:40:51AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >>Hi Greg,
> >>
> >>On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 15:40:35 -0700 Greg KH wrote:
> >>>We are running out of time, my tree is pretty much cl
On 06/25/2013 07:50 AM, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 09:40:51AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Greg,
On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 15:40:35 -0700 Greg KH wrote:
We are running out of time, my tree is pretty much closed for 3.11 now,
should I just disable the build of this module for 3.11?
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 09:40:51AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 15:40:35 -0700 Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > We are running out of time, my tree is pretty much closed for 3.11 now,
> > should I just disable the build of this module for 3.11?
>
> That's what I've bee
Hi Greg,
On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 15:40:35 -0700 Greg KH wrote:
>
> We are running out of time, my tree is pretty much closed for 3.11 now,
> should I just disable the build of this module for 3.11?
That's what I've been doing - it has never been enabled in a final
linux-next release. So, it should
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 05:26:57PM +0800, Peng Tao wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > allyesconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > In file included from
> > drivers/staging/lustre/
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 10:37 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 05:26:57PM +0800, Peng Tao wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Stephen Rothwell
>> wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
>> > allyesconfig) failed like this:
> -Original Message-
> From: Samuel Ortiz [mailto:sa...@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 4:25 PM
> To: Stephen Rothwell
> Cc: linux-n...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Chao Xie; Yi
> Zhang
> Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure aft
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 05:26:57PM +0800, Peng Tao wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > allyesconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > In file included from
> > drivers/staging/lustre/
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> In file included from
> drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/libcfs/libcfs.h:203:0,
> from drivers/staging/
Hi Stephen,
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 05:19:57PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/mfd/88pm800.c: In function 'pm800_pages_init':
> drivers/mfd/88pm800.c:434:2: error: implicit
On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 12:56 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/ni_labpc.c: In function 'labpc_ai_cmd':
> drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/ni_labpc.c:980:9: error: imp
On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 12:56 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
Ugh.. powerpc probably has CONFIG_ISA_DMA_API but not
CONFIG_VIRT_TO_BUS.
I'm looking for a fix now.
Regards,
Hartley
--
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> net/netlink/af_netlink.c: In function 'netlink_frame_flush_dcache':
> net/netlink/af_netlink.c:384:40: error: 'NL_MMAP_MSG_HDRLEN' unde
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 17:46:18 +1000
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> net/netlink/af_netlink.c: In function 'netlink_frame_flush_dcache':
> net/netlink/af_netlink.c:384:40: error: 'NL_MMAP_MSG_HDRLEN'
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 16:00:18 +1000
> After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> net/core/netprio_cgroup.c:250:29: error: static declaration of
> 'net_prio_subsys' follows non-static declaration
> include/linux/
1 - 100 of 233 matches
Mail list logo
