Hi Stephen,
> Today's linux-next merge of the wireless-next tree got a conflict in
> net/wireless/nl80211.c between merge commits from the net-next tree and
> commit 86e8cf98de3e ("nl80211: use small state buffer for wiphy_dump")
> from the wireless-next tree.
Looks good, yes.
> I think I fixed
On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 18:40 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 08:47:54 +0200 Luciano Coelho wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 2013-02-10 at 18:58 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 13:33 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Today's linux-next merg
Hi all,
On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 08:47:54 +0200 Luciano Coelho wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2013-02-10 at 18:58 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 13:33 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the wireless-next tree got conflicts in
> > > drivers/net/wireless/ti/
On Sun, 2013-02-10 at 18:58 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 13:33 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi John,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the wireless-next tree got conflicts in
> > drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/sdio.c and
> > drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/spi.c between
On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 13:33 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the wireless-next tree got conflicts in
> drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/sdio.c and
> drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/spi.c between commit 0d2e7a5c6080
> ("wireless: Remove unnecessary alloc/OOM me
5 matches
Mail list logo
