.kernel.org>; nicolas.pa...@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr; linux-scsi
> ; Ming Lei ; Sumit Saxena
> ; Shivasharan S
>
> Subject: Re: problem booting 5.10
>
> On 09/12/2020 15:44, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 8 Dec 2020, John Garry wrote:
> >
Julia,
> 5.10-rc7 plus these three commits boots fine.
Great! Thanks for confirming.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
On 09/12/2020 15:44, Julia Lawall wrote:
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020, John Garry wrote:
On 08/12/2020 22:51, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
Julia,
This solves the problem. Starting from 5.10-rc7 and doing this revert, I
get a kernel that boots.
Hi Julia,
Can you also please test Ming's patchset here
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020, John Garry wrote:
> On 08/12/2020 22:51, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> >
> > Julia,
> >
> > > This solves the problem. Starting from 5.10-rc7 and doing this revert, I
> > > get a kernel that boots.
> >
>
> Hi Julia,
>
> Can you also please test Ming's patchset here (without
On 08/12/2020 22:51, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
Julia,
This solves the problem. Starting from 5.10-rc7 and doing this revert, I
get a kernel that boots.
Hi Julia,
Can you also please test Ming's patchset here (without the megaraid sas
revert) when you get a chance:
Linus,
> I'll take this as an "ack" for the revert, though ;)
Indeed!
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
On 12/8/20 3:56 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 2:54 PM Martin K. Petersen
> wrote:
>>
>> Oh, I just realized the megaraid patch went in through block.
>
> I'll take this as an "ack" for the revert, though ;)
You can add mine too, if you wish.
We'll follow up in 5.11 time
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 2:54 PM Martin K. Petersen
wrote:
>
> Oh, I just realized the megaraid patch went in through block.
I'll take this as an "ack" for the revert, though ;)
Linus
Jens,
> Thanks for testing! Linus, do you just want to revert this, or do you
> want me to queue it up?
Oh, I just realized the megaraid patch went in through block.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 2:47 PM Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 3:42 PM Julia Lawall wrote:
> >
> > This solves the problem. Starting from 5.10-rc7 and doing this
> > revert, I get a kernel that boots.
>
> Thanks for testing! Linus, do you just want to revert this, or do you
> want
Julia,
> This solves the problem. Starting from 5.10-rc7 and doing this revert, I
> get a kernel that boots.
Thanks for testing!
I'll go ahead and revert 103fbf8e4020 in 5.10/scsi-fixes. We can revisit
this change in 5.11 when Ming's fixes are in place.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 3:42 PM Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Dec 2020, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 1:14 PM John Garry wrote:
> > >
> > > JFYI, About "scsi: megaraid_sas: Added support for shared host tagset
> > > for cpuhotplug", we did have an issue reported here
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 1:14 PM John Garry wrote:
> >
> > JFYI, About "scsi: megaraid_sas: Added support for shared host tagset
> > for cpuhotplug", we did have an issue reported here already from Qian
> > about a boot hang:
>
> Hmm. That does sound
On 12/8/20 2:25 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> [ Just re-sending with Jens added back - he's been on a couple of the
> emails, but wean't on this one. Sorry for the duplication ]
Don't think I was, but gmail shows me the rest of the thread now.
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 1:23 PM Linus Torvalds
>
[ Just re-sending with Jens added back - he's been on a couple of the
emails, but wean't on this one. Sorry for the duplication ]
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 1:23 PM Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 1:14 PM John Garry wrote:
> >
> > JFYI, About "scsi: megaraid_sas: Added support for
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 1:14 PM John Garry wrote:
>
> JFYI, About "scsi: megaraid_sas: Added support for shared host tagset
> for cpuhotplug", we did have an issue reported here already from Qian
> about a boot hang:
Hmm. That does sound like it might be it.
At this point, the patches from Ming
On 08/12/2020 19:19, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 10:59 AM Martin K. Petersen
wrote:
So I'm adding SCSI people to the cc, just in case they go "Hmm..".
Only change in this department was:
831e3405c2a3 scsi: core: Don't start concurrent async scan on same host
Yeah, I
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 10:59 AM Martin K. Petersen
> wrote:
> >
> > > So I'm adding SCSI people to the cc, just in case they go "Hmm..".
> >
> > Only change in this department was:
> >
> > 831e3405c2a3 scsi: core: Don't start concurrent async scan on
Linus,
> So I'm adding SCSI people to the cc, just in case they go "Hmm..".
Only change in this department was:
831e3405c2a3 scsi: core: Don't start concurrent async scan on same host
which went into -rc2. I can't think of anything in -rc1 which would
affect scanning.
I'll take a look this
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 11:29 AM Julia Lawall wrote:
>
> A dmesg after successfully booting in 5.9 is attached.
Ok, from a quick look it's megaraid_sas.
The only thing I see there is that commit 103fbf8e4020 ("scsi:
megaraid_sas: Added support for shared host tagset for cpuhotplug").
Of course,
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 10:59 AM Martin K. Petersen
wrote:
>
> > So I'm adding SCSI people to the cc, just in case they go "Hmm..".
>
> Only change in this department was:
>
> 831e3405c2a3 scsi: core: Don't start concurrent async scan on same host
Yeah, I found that one too, and dismissed it for
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 9:37 AM Julia Lawall wrote:
> >
> > We have not succeeded to boot 5.10 on our Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7-8870 v4 @
> > 2.10GHz server. Previous versions (eg 4.19 - 5.9) boot fine. We have
> > tried various rcs.
>
> So the
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 9:37 AM Julia Lawall wrote:
>
> We have not succeeded to boot 5.10 on our Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7-8870 v4 @
> 2.10GHz server. Previous versions (eg 4.19 - 5.9) boot fine. We have
> tried various rcs.
So the problem started with rc1?
Could you try bisecting - even
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020, Julia Lawall wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We have not succeeded to boot 5.10 on our Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7-8870 v4 @
> 2.10GHz server. Previous versions (eg 4.19 - 5.9) boot fine. We have
> tried various rcs. The backtrace for rc7 is shown below.
Some more information, from
24 matches
Mail list logo
