RE: test10-pre7 (LINK ordering)

2000-10-31 Thread Dunlap, Randy
> > With CONFIG_USB=y and all other USB modules built as > > modules (=m), linking usbdrv.o into the kernel image > > gives this: > > > drivers/usb/usbdrv.o(.data+0x2f4): undefined reference to > > Works for me here, .config attached. Local changes, merge error, or > similar? I don't have any

Re: test10-pre7 (LINK ordering)

2000-10-31 Thread Keith Owens
On Tue, 31 Oct 2000 17:24:24 -0800, "Dunlap, Randy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Is it valid to run depmod like this before >booting the kernel that has usbcore in-kernel? >depmod -ae works after I boot that kernel + usbcore. To run depmod against a new 2.4.0-test10 kernel, make modules_install

RE: test10-pre7 (LINK ordering)

2000-10-31 Thread Dunlap, Randy
> > > With CONFIG_USB=y and all other USB modules built as > > > modules (=m), linking usbdrv.o into the kernel image > > > gives this: > > > > > drivers/usb/usbdrv.o(.data+0x2f4): undefined reference to > > > > Works for me here, .config attached. Local changes, merge error, or > > similar? I

Re: test10-pre7 (LINK ordering)

2000-10-31 Thread Jeff Garzik
Randy Dunlap wrote: > With CONFIG_USB=y and all other USB modules built as > modules (=m), linking usbdrv.o into the kernel image > gives this: > drivers/usb/usbdrv.o(.data+0x2f4): undefined reference to Works for me here, .config attached. Local changes, merge error, or similar? I don't have

Re: test10-pre7 (LINK ordering)

2000-10-31 Thread Randy Dunlap
Linus Torvalds wrote: > [snip] > > That was going to be my next question if somebody actually said "sure". > > The question was rhetorical, since the way LINK_FIRST is implemented > means > that it has all the same problems that $(obj-y) has, and is hard to get > right in the generic case (but