On Tue 2019-07-30 19:27:07, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 03:23:33PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Tue 2019-07-23 19:50:08, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > > [This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any
> > > suggestions
> > > to make it better, or if you want
On 7/30/19 8:57 PM, Eric Biggers wrote:
> syzbot finds a lot of security bugs, and security bugs are important. And the
> bugs are still there regardless of whether they're reported by human or bot.
>
> Also, there *are* bugs being fixed because of these reminders; some subsystem
> maintainers
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 07:04:47AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
>
> On 7/24/19 11:09 PM, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 01:09:28PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> >> From: Eric Biggers
> >> Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 11:37:12 -0700
> >>
> >>> We can argue about what words to use to
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 03:47:45PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
>
> On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 19:50:08 -0700
> >
> > [This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any
> > suggestions
> > to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
> >
> > Of the
On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 03:23:33PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Tue 2019-07-23 19:50:08, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > [This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any
> > suggestions
> > to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
> >
> > Of the
The deadline is this Friday, please get your proposals in as soon as
possible and do not procrastinate. The deadline absolutely cannot be
extended.
This is a call for proposals for the 3 day networking track at the
Linux Plumbers Conference in Lisbon, which will be happening on
September
On Tue 2019-07-23 19:50:08, Eric Biggers wrote:
> [This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any
> suggestions
> to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
>
> Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've
> manually
On 7/24/19 11:09 PM, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 01:09:28PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Eric Biggers
>> Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 11:37:12 -0700
>>
>>> We can argue about what words to use to describe this situation, but
>>> it doesn't change the situation itself.
>>
>>
with all this. Fix bisection would be really useful. I think what we'd
actually need to do to get decent results, though, is consider many different
signals (days since last occurred, repro type, fix bisected, bug bisected,
occurred in mainline or not, does the repro work as root, is i
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 01:09:28PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Biggers
> Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 11:37:12 -0700
>
> > We can argue about what words to use to describe this situation, but
> > it doesn't change the situation itself.
>
> And we should argue about those words because it
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 01:09:28PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Biggers
> Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 11:37:12 -0700
>
> > We can argue about what words to use to describe this situation, but
> > it doesn't change the situation itself.
>
> And we should argue about those words because it
From: Eric Biggers
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 11:37:12 -0700
> We can argue about what words to use to describe this situation, but
> it doesn't change the situation itself.
And we should argue about those words because it matters to humans and
effects how they feel, and humans ultimately fix these
ing copies of them
> repeatedly will be of any help.
>
> Maybe a simple monthly reminder with one URL to go to the list of bugs
> would be less intrusive.
>
The bogus bisection results is a known issue (which I'm trying to convince
Dmitry is important enough to fix...), wh
ion?
syzbot sends emails, plenty of them, with many wrong bisection
results, increasing the noise.
If nobody is interested, I am not sure sending copies of them
repeatedly will be of any help.
Maybe a simple monthly reminder with one URL to go to the list of bugs
would be less intrusive.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 11:12:25AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Biggers
> Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 09:30:14 -0700
>
> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 08:39:05AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >> Some of the bugs have been fixed already, before syzbot found them.
> >>
> >> Why force human to be
From: Eric Biggers
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 09:30:14 -0700
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 08:39:05AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> Some of the bugs have been fixed already, before syzbot found them.
>>
>> Why force human to be gentle to bots and actually replying to them ?
>>
>> I usually simply wait
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 08:39:05AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
>
> On 7/24/19 3:38 AM, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > [This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any
> > suggestions
> > to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
> >
> > Of the
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 09:08:26AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 04:47:23 +0200,
> Eric Biggers wrote:
> >
> > [This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any
> > suggestions
> > to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
> >
On 7/23/2019 9:45 PM, Eric Biggers wrote:
Title: WARNING in perf_reg_value
Last occurred: 25 days ago
Reported: 34 days ago
Branches: Mainline and others
Dashboard
On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 04:47:23 +0200,
Eric Biggers wrote:
>
> [This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any
> suggestions
> to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
>
> Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've
On 7/24/19 3:38 AM, Eric Biggers wrote:
> [This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any
> suggestions
> to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
>
> Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've
> manually
>
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 3 of them as possibly being bugs in the isdn subsystem.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 11:05:14AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> >
> > Title: KASAN: use-after-free Write in tlb_finish_mmu
> > Last occurred: 5 days ago
> > Reported: 4 days ago
> > Branches:
On 2019/7/24 上午10:38, Eric Biggers wrote:
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any
suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest
status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've
manually
marked 3
On 2019/7/24 上午10:38, Eric Biggers wrote:
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 3 of them
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 1 of them as possibly being a bug in the
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 1 of them as possibly being a bug in the
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 1 of them as possibly being a bug in the "net/pfkey"
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 1 of them as possibly being a bug in the "net/ppp"
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 1 of them as possibly being a bug in the "net/sunrpc"
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 1 of them as possibly being a bug in the
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 1 of them as possibly being a bug in the rtc subsystem.
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 1 of them as possibly being a bug in the
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 1 of them as possibly being a bug in the
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 1 of them as possibly being a bug in the sound
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 2 of them as possibly being bugs in the "net/l2tp"
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 2 of them as possibly being bugs in the "net/rxrpc"
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 2 of them as possibly being bugs in the
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 3 of them as possibly being bugs in the hid subsystem.
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 3 of them as possibly being bugs in the "net/kcm"
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 3 of them as possibly being bugs in the "net/llc"
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 3 of them as possibly being bugs in the "net/rose"
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 3 of them as possibly being bugs in the vhost
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 4 of them as possibly being bugs in the "net/hsr"
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 4 of them as possibly being bugs in the "net/rds"
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 4 of them as possibly being bugs in the tty subsystem.
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 5 of them as possibly being bugs in the "fs/fuse"
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 5 of them as possibly being bugs in the "fs/ntfs"
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 5 of them as possibly being bugs in the "fs/reiserfs"
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 5 of them as possibly being bugs in the "net/smc"
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 5 of them as possibly being bugs in the "net/x25"
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 6 of them as possibly being bugs in the "net/dccp"
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 8 of them as possibly being bugs in the input
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 10 of them as possibly being bugs in the "net/sctp"
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 11 of them as possibly being bugs in the RDMA
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 11 of them as possibly being bugs in the "net/wireless"
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 13 of them as possibly being bugs in the "net/netrom"
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 14 of them as possibly being bugs in the "net/tipc"
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 18 of them as possibly being bugs in the "fs/9p"
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 19 of them as possibly being bugs in the perf
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 25 of them as possibly being bugs in the kvm subsystem.
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 26 of them as possibly being bugs in the "net/xfrm"
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=05e856115d50ca3d56e1fbea58b612a78877be65
Unfortunately, this bug does not have a reproducer.
For some reason the syzbot dashboard doesn't contain a link to the original
thread for this bug, so my script couldn't provide a link to it in this
reminder. Try searching for
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 35 of them as possibly being bugs in the media
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 99 of them as possibly being bugs in the net subsystem.
This is a call for proposals for the 3 day networking track at the
Linux Plumbers Conference in Lisbon, which will be happening on
September 9th-11th, 2019.
We are seeking talks of 40 minutes in length (including Q & A),
optionally accompanied by papers of 2 to 10 pages in length. The
papers,
hat the issue is not present in the
commit immediately before your commit, and that it appears when just
"kernel/workqueue: Use dynamic lockdep keys for workqueues" and
"locking/lockdep: Shrink struct lock_class_key" are applied (the latter is
needed to fix a WARNING the r
On 7/9/19 10:58 PM, Eric Biggers wrote:
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 5 of them as
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.
Note: currently the mm bugs look hard to do anything with and most look
outdated, but I figured I'd send them out just in case someone has
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 5 of them as possibly being bugs in the lockdep
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 5 of them as possibly being bugs in the "fs/reiserfs"
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 5 of them as possibly being bugs in the "fs/ntfs"
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 4 of them as possibly being bugs in the sound
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 2 of them as possibly being bugs in the
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 1 of them as possibly being a bug in the
orted: 63 days ago
Branches: net-next
Dashboard link:
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=05e856115d50ca3d56e1fbea58b612a78877be65
Unfortunately, this bug does not have a reproducer.
For some reason the syzbot dashboard doesn't contain a link to the original
thread for this bug,
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 1 of them as possibly being a bug in the
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 47 of them as possibly being bugs in the usb subsystem.
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 10:03 PM Eric Biggers wrote:
>
> [This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any
> suggestions
> to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
>
> Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've
>
On 07/02, Eric Biggers wrote:
>
> Even if it's a lockdep false positive you can't ignore it. People rely on
> lockdep to find bugs, and they will keep sending you bug reports. So someone
> has to fix something. Did you see Oleg's suggestion to change mmput() to
> mmput_async() in
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 36 of them as possibly being bugs in the "net/bpf"
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 3 of them as possibly being bugs in the
On 7/3/19 9:49 AM, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 09:29:39AM +0530, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> On 7/3/19 9:25 AM, Eric Biggers wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 09:09:55AM +0530, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
On 7/2/19 11:13 AM, Eric Biggers wrote:
>
On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 09:29:39AM +0530, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On 7/3/19 9:25 AM, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 09:09:55AM +0530, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 7/2/19 11:13 AM, Eric Biggers wrote:
> >>>
Hi Eric,
On 7/3/19 9:25 AM, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 09:09:55AM +0530, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 7/2/19 11:13 AM, Eric Biggers wrote:
>>>
>>> Title: possible deadlock in
On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 09:09:55AM +0530, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
>
>
> On 7/2/19 11:13 AM, Eric Biggers wrote:
> >
> > Title: possible deadlock in uprobe_clear_state
> > Last occurred: 164 days ago
>
On 7/2/19 11:13 AM, Eric Biggers wrote:
>
> Title: possible deadlock in uprobe_clear_state
> Last occurred: 164 days ago
> Reported: 201 days ago
> Branches: Mainline
>
On 2019/7/2 下午1:32, Eric Biggers wrote:
On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 01:24:43PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
Title: INFO: task hung in vhost_init_device_iotlb
Last occurred: 125 days ago
Reported:
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 18 of them as possibly being bugs in the "fs/9p"
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 5 of them as possibly being bugs in the "net/hsr"
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 6 of them as possibly being bugs in the "net/smc"
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 3 of them as possibly being bugs in the "net/rxrpc"
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 6 of them as possibly being bugs in the "net/dccp"
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 22 of them as possibly being bugs in the perf
On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 01:24:43PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> >
> > Title: INFO: task hung in vhost_init_device_iotlb
> > Last occurred: 125 days ago
> > Reported: 153 days ago
> >
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 5 of them as possibly being bugs in the "fs/fuse"
On 2019/7/2 下午1:17, Eric Biggers wrote:
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 2 of them
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 2 of them as possibly being bugs in the vhost
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 2 of them as possibly being bugs in the
[This email was generated by a script. Let me know if you have any suggestions
to make it better, or if you want it re-generated with the latest status.]
Of the currently open syzbot reports against the upstream kernel, I've manually
marked 1 of them as possibly being a bug in the
1 - 100 of 268 matches
Mail list logo
