I wait for your response.

2021-04-17 Thread Agata Arnoldo
Dear Beloved, How are you doing, hope all is well? Please I am verifying if your email is still working, I have sent you several messages, but could not get any reply from you, would you get back to me? I have an important message for you. Please write me through my private email for more clarifi

[PATCH 4.14 44/68] net/ncsi: Avoid GFP_KERNEL in response handler

2021-04-15 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
From: Samuel Mendoza-Jonas commit b0949618826cbb64e9ba764bdd52aa14eaf5073d upstream. ncsi_rsp_handler_gc() allocates the filter arrays using GFP_KERNEL in softirq context, causing the below backtrace. This allocation is only a few dozen bytes during probing so allocate with GFP_ATOMIC instead.

[PATCH 4.14 41/68] net/ncsi: Dont return error on normal response

2021-04-15 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
From: Samuel Mendoza-Jonas commit 04bad8bda9e25afe676a6f4452f3b304c1fdea16 upstream. Several response handlers return EBUSY if the data corresponding to the command/response pair is already set. There is no reason to return an error here; the channel is advertising something as enabled because

URGENT RESPONSE NEEDED.

2021-04-13 Thread ibrahim musa
18years, because the money will be recalled to the Bank treasury account as unclaimed fund. I am ready to share with you 40% for you and 60% will be kept for me, by indicating your interest i will send you the full details on how the business will be executed, i will be waiting for your urgent response.

Urgent Response

2021-04-12 Thread Alexandra Kelly
response.

Re: I appreciate your quick response.

2021-04-11 Thread Mr. Ying Wang
name and phone number and I will call to give you more information. I await your response. Sincerely, Mr. Ying Wang

[PATCH v13 13/13] vfio/pci: Inject page response upon response region fill

2021-04-11 Thread Eric Auger
When the userspace increments the head of the page response buffer ring, let's push the response into the iommu layer. This is done through a workqueue that pops the responses from the ring buffer and increment the tail. Signed-off-by: Eric Auger --- drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c

[PATCH v13 12/13] vfio/pci: Register a DMA fault response region

2021-04-11 Thread Eric Auger
In preparation for vSVA, let's register a DMA fault response region, where the userspace will push the page responses and increment the head of the buffer. The kernel will pop those responses and inject them on iommu side. Signed-off-by: Eric Auger --- v11 -> v12: - use DMA_FAULT_RESP

[PATCH v8 07/11] scsi: ufshpb: Add hpb dev reset response

2021-04-10 Thread Avri Altman
The spec does not define what is the host's recommended response when the device send hpb dev reset response (oper 0x2). We will update all active hpb regions: mark them and do that on the next read. Signed-off-by: Avri Altman Reviewed-by: Daejun Park --- drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c

Your urgent response is needed

2021-04-06 Thread Dr Bryan Bouchet
Dear Friend, With due respect, i have decided to contact you on a business transaction that will be beneficial to both of us. At the bank last account and auditing evaluation, my staffs came across an old account which was being maintained by a foreign client who we learn was among the deceased pa

Re: [PATCH 1/4] fsi: occ: Don't accept response from un-initialized OCC

2021-04-06 Thread Joel Stanley
On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 at 17:12, Eddie James wrote: > > If the OCC is not initialized and responds as such, the driver > should continue waiting for a valid response until the timeout > expires. > > Signed-off-by: Eddie James Reviewed-by: Joel Stanley I guess we should ad

I wait for your prompt response,

2021-03-31 Thread Patricia Leson
Dear Friend, May the grace, peace, love and the truth in the word of God be with you and all those that you love and care for. Please permit me to share with you, my desire to go into this Godly business partnership with you as I believe that You and I can cooperate together in this humanitarian so

[PATCH v7 07/11] scsi: ufshpb: Add hpb dev reset response

2021-03-31 Thread Avri Altman
The spec does not define what is the host's recommended response when the device send hpb dev reset response (oper 0x2). We will update all active hpb regions: mark them and do that on the next read. Signed-off-by: Avri Altman --- drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c

[PATCH v6 06/10] scsi: ufshpb: Add hpb dev reset response

2021-03-22 Thread Avri Altman
The spec does not define what is the host's recommended response when the device send hpb dev reset response (oper 0x2). We will update all active hpb regions: mark them and do that on the next read. Signed-off-by: Avri Altman --- drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c

RE: [PATCH v5 06/10] scsi: ufshpb: Add hpb dev reset response

2021-03-18 Thread Avri Altman
> On 2021-03-17 23:46, Avri Altman wrote: > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Just curious, directly doing below things inside ufshpb_rsp_upiu() > >> >> >> >> does > >> >> >> >> not > >> >> >> >> seem a problem to me, does this really deserve a separate work? > >> >> >> > I don't know, I never even conside

Re: [PATCH v5 06/10] scsi: ufshpb: Add hpb dev reset response

2021-03-17 Thread Can Guo
On 2021-03-17 23:46, Avri Altman wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Just curious, directly doing below things inside ufshpb_rsp_upiu() >> >> >> does >> >> >> not >> >> >> seem a problem to me, does this really deserve a separate work? >> >> > I don't know, I never even consider of doing this. >> >> > The a

RE: [PATCH v5 06/10] scsi: ufshpb: Add hpb dev reset response

2021-03-17 Thread Avri Altman
> >> >> >> > >> >> >> Just curious, directly doing below things inside ufshpb_rsp_upiu() > >> >> >> does > >> >> >> not > >> >> >> seem a problem to me, does this really deserve a separate work? > >> >> > I don't know, I never even consider of doing this. > >> >> > The active region list may contai

Re: [PATCH v5 06/10] scsi: ufshpb: Add hpb dev reset response

2021-03-17 Thread Can Guo
On 2021-03-17 22:22, Avri Altman wrote: On 2021-03-17 20:22, Avri Altman wrote: >> >> On 2021-03-17 19:23, Avri Altman wrote: >> >> >> >> On 2021-03-02 21:24, Avri Altman wrote: >> >> > The spec does not define what is the host's recomme

RE: [PATCH v5 06/10] scsi: ufshpb: Add hpb dev reset response

2021-03-17 Thread Avri Altman
> > On 2021-03-17 20:22, Avri Altman wrote: > >> > >> On 2021-03-17 19:23, Avri Altman wrote: > >> >> > >> >> On 2021-03-02 21:24, Avri Altman wrote: > >> >> > The spec does not define what is the host's recommend

Re: [PATCH v5 06/10] scsi: ufshpb: Add hpb dev reset response

2021-03-17 Thread Can Guo
On 2021-03-17 20:22, Avri Altman wrote: On 2021-03-17 19:23, Avri Altman wrote: >> >> On 2021-03-02 21:24, Avri Altman wrote: >> > The spec does not define what is the host's recommended response when >> > the device send hpb dev reset response (oper 0x2).

RE: [PATCH v5 06/10] scsi: ufshpb: Add hpb dev reset response

2021-03-17 Thread Avri Altman
> > On 2021-03-17 19:23, Avri Altman wrote: > >> > >> On 2021-03-02 21:24, Avri Altman wrote: > >> > The spec does not define what is the host's recommended response when > >> > the device send hpb dev reset response (oper 0x2). > >>

Re: [PATCH v5 06/10] scsi: ufshpb: Add hpb dev reset response

2021-03-17 Thread Can Guo
On 2021-03-17 19:23, Avri Altman wrote: On 2021-03-02 21:24, Avri Altman wrote: > The spec does not define what is the host's recommended response when > the device send hpb dev reset response (oper 0x2). > > We will update all active hpb regions: mark them and do that on

RE: [PATCH v5 06/10] scsi: ufshpb: Add hpb dev reset response

2021-03-17 Thread Avri Altman
> > On 2021-03-02 21:24, Avri Altman wrote: > > The spec does not define what is the host's recommended response when > > the device send hpb dev reset response (oper 0x2). > > > > We will update all active hpb regions: mark them and do that on the > > n

Re: [PATCH v5 06/10] scsi: ufshpb: Add hpb dev reset response

2021-03-17 Thread Can Guo
On 2021-03-02 21:24, Avri Altman wrote: The spec does not define what is the host's recommended response when the device send hpb dev reset response (oper 0x2). We will update all active hpb regions: mark them and do that on the next read. Signed-off-by: Avri Altman --- drivers/scs

YOUR URGENT RESPONSE IS NEEDED NOW

2021-03-15 Thread ibrahim aliu
-- I am contacting you on a business deal of $17.5 Million US Dollars, ready for transfer into your account if we make this claim, we will share it 60%/40%.100% risk free and it will be legally backed up with government approved If you are interested reply for more details. Kindly reply for mor

RE: [PATCH v5 06/10] scsi: ufshpb: Add hpb dev reset response

2021-03-15 Thread Avri Altman
> > +static void ufshpb_reset_work_handler(struct work_struct *work) > > +{ > > + struct ufshpb_lu *hpb; > > struct ufshpb_lu *hpb = container_of(work, struct ufshpb_lu, > ufshpb_lun_reset_work); > > > + struct victim_select_info *lru_info; > > struct victim_select_info

Re: [PATCH v5 06/10] scsi: ufshpb: Add hpb dev reset response

2021-03-14 Thread Can Guo
On 2021-03-15 09:34, Can Guo wrote: On 2021-03-02 21:24, Avri Altman wrote: The spec does not define what is the host's recommended response when the device send hpb dev reset response (oper 0x2). We will update all active hpb regions: mark them and do that on the next read. Signed-o

Re: [PATCH v5 06/10] scsi: ufshpb: Add hpb dev reset response

2021-03-14 Thread Can Guo
On 2021-03-02 21:24, Avri Altman wrote: The spec does not define what is the host's recommended response when the device send hpb dev reset response (oper 0x2). We will update all active hpb regions: mark them and do that on the next read. Signed-off-by: Avri Altman --- drivers/scs

[PATCH v5 06/10] scsi: ufshpb: Add hpb dev reset response

2021-03-02 Thread Avri Altman
The spec does not define what is the host's recommended response when the device send hpb dev reset response (oper 0x2). We will update all active hpb regions: mark them and do that on the next read. Signed-off-by: Avri Altman --- drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c

RE: [PATCH v4 6/9] scsi: ufshpb: Add hpb dev reset response

2021-03-02 Thread Avri Altman
> > Hi Avri, > > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c > > index cf704b82e72a..f33aa28e0a0a 100644 > > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c > > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c > > @@ -642,7 +642,8 @@ int ufshpb_prep(struct ufs_hba *hba, struct > ufshcd_lrb *lrbp) > >

RE: [PATCH v4 6/9] scsi: ufshpb: Add hpb dev reset response

2021-03-02 Thread Avri Altman
> Hi Avri, > > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c > > index cf704b82e72a..f33aa28e0a0a 100644 > > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c > > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c > > @@ -642,7 +642,8 @@ int ufshpb_prep(struct ufs_hba *hba, struct > ufshcd_lrb *lrbp) > >

RE: [PATCH v4 6/9] scsi: ufshpb: Add hpb dev reset response

2021-03-02 Thread Daejun Park
Hi Avri, > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c > index cf704b82e72a..f33aa28e0a0a 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c > @@ -642,7 +642,8 @@ int ufshpb_prep(struct ufs_hba *hba, struct ufshcd_lrb > *lrbp) > if (

[PATCH 5.11 491/775] mei: hbm: call mei_set_devstate() on hbm stop response

2021-03-01 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
From: Alexander Usyskin [ Upstream commit 3a77df62deb2e62de0dc26c1cb763cc152329287 ] Use mei_set_devstate() wrapper upon hbm stop command response, to trigger sysfs event. Fixes: 43b8a7ed4739 ("mei: expose device state in sysfs") Signed-off-by: Alexander Usyskin Signed-off-by: Tom

[PATCH 5.11 026/775] Bluetooth: Fix initializing response id after clearing struct

2021-03-01 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
From: Christopher William Snowhill [ Upstream commit a5687c644015a097304a2e47476c0ecab2065734 ] Looks like this was missed when patching the source to clear the structures throughout, causing this one instance to clear the struct after the response id is assigned. Fixes: eddb7732119d

[PATCH 5.10 407/663] mei: hbm: call mei_set_devstate() on hbm stop response

2021-03-01 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
From: Alexander Usyskin [ Upstream commit 3a77df62deb2e62de0dc26c1cb763cc152329287 ] Use mei_set_devstate() wrapper upon hbm stop command response, to trigger sysfs event. Fixes: 43b8a7ed4739 ("mei: expose device state in sysfs") Signed-off-by: Alexander Usyskin Signed-off-by: Tom

[PATCH 5.10 024/663] Bluetooth: Fix initializing response id after clearing struct

2021-03-01 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
From: Christopher William Snowhill [ Upstream commit a5687c644015a097304a2e47476c0ecab2065734 ] Looks like this was missed when patching the source to clear the structures throughout, causing this one instance to clear the struct after the response id is assigned. Fixes: eddb7732119d

[PATCH 5.4 208/340] mei: hbm: call mei_set_devstate() on hbm stop response

2021-03-01 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
From: Alexander Usyskin [ Upstream commit 3a77df62deb2e62de0dc26c1cb763cc152329287 ] Use mei_set_devstate() wrapper upon hbm stop command response, to trigger sysfs event. Fixes: 43b8a7ed4739 ("mei: expose device state in sysfs") Signed-off-by: Alexander Usyskin Signed-off-by: Tom

[PATCH 5.4 016/340] Bluetooth: Fix initializing response id after clearing struct

2021-03-01 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
From: Christopher William Snowhill [ Upstream commit a5687c644015a097304a2e47476c0ecab2065734 ] Looks like this was missed when patching the source to clear the structures throughout, causing this one instance to clear the struct after the response id is assigned. Fixes: eddb7732119d

[PATCH 4.19 026/247] Bluetooth: Fix initializing response id after clearing struct

2021-03-01 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
From: Christopher William Snowhill [ Upstream commit a5687c644015a097304a2e47476c0ecab2065734 ] Looks like this was missed when patching the source to clear the structures throughout, causing this one instance to clear the struct after the response id is assigned. Fixes: eddb7732119d

[PATCH 4.14 013/176] Bluetooth: Fix initializing response id after clearing struct

2021-03-01 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
From: Christopher William Snowhill [ Upstream commit a5687c644015a097304a2e47476c0ecab2065734 ] Looks like this was missed when patching the source to clear the structures throughout, causing this one instance to clear the struct after the response id is assigned. Fixes: eddb7732119d

[PATCH 4.9 013/134] Bluetooth: Fix initializing response id after clearing struct

2021-03-01 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
From: Christopher William Snowhill [ Upstream commit a5687c644015a097304a2e47476c0ecab2065734 ] Looks like this was missed when patching the source to clear the structures throughout, causing this one instance to clear the struct after the response id is assigned. Fixes: eddb7732119d

[PATCH 4.4 09/93] Bluetooth: Fix initializing response id after clearing struct

2021-03-01 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
From: Christopher William Snowhill [ Upstream commit a5687c644015a097304a2e47476c0ecab2065734 ] Looks like this was missed when patching the source to clear the structures throughout, causing this one instance to clear the struct after the response id is assigned. Fixes: eddb7732119d

[PATCH v4 6/9] scsi: ufshpb: Add hpb dev reset response

2021-02-26 Thread Avri Altman
The spec does not define what is the host's recommended response when the device send hpb dev reset response (oper 0x2). We will update all active hpb regions: mark them and do that on the next read. Signed-off-by: Avri Altman --- drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c

[PATCH v12 12/13] vfio/pci: Register a DMA fault response region

2021-02-23 Thread Eric Auger
In preparation for vSVA, let's register a DMA fault response region, where the userspace will push the page responses and increment the head of the buffer. The kernel will pop those responses and inject them on iommu side. Signed-off-by: Eric Auger --- v11 -> v12: - use DMA_FAULT_RESP

[PATCH v12 13/13] vfio/pci: Inject page response upon response region fill

2021-02-23 Thread Eric Auger
When the userspace increments the head of the page response buffer ring, let's push the response into the iommu layer. This is done through a workqueue that pops the responses from the ring buffer and increment the tail. Signed-off-by: Eric Auger --- drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c

Urgent Response

2021-02-20 Thread Alexandra Kelly
response.

[PATCH v3 6/9] scsi: ufshpb: Add hpb dev reset response

2021-02-18 Thread Avri Altman
The spec does not define what is the host's recommended response when the device send hpb dev reset response (oper 0x2). We will update all active hpb regions: mark them and do that on the next read. Signed-off-by: Avri Altman --- drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c

Re: [PATCH v11 12/13] vfio/pci: Register a DMA fault response region

2021-02-18 Thread Auger Eric
.@linaro.org; zhangfei@linaro.org; >>> zhangfei@gmail.com; vivek.gau...@arm.com; Shameerali Kolothum >>> Thodi ; >>> jacob.jun@linux.intel.com; yi.l@intel.com; t...@semihalf.com; >>> nicoleots...@gmail.com; yuzenghui >>> Subject: [PATCH v11 1

RE: [PATCH v11 12/13] vfio/pci: Register a DMA fault response region

2021-02-18 Thread Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
Kolothum > > Thodi ; > > jacob.jun@linux.intel.com; yi.l@intel.com; t...@semihalf.com; > > nicoleots...@gmail.com; yuzenghui > > Subject: [PATCH v11 12/13] vfio/pci: Register a DMA fault response > > region > > > > In preparation for vSVA, let's r

Re: [PATCH 4/4] hwmon: (occ) Print response status in first poll error message

2021-02-09 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 11:12:35AM -0600, Eddie James wrote: > In order to better debug problems starting up the driver, print > the response status from the OCC in the error logged when the first > poll command fails. > > Signed-off-by: Eddie James Acked-by: Guenter Roeck &

[PATCH 4/4] hwmon: (occ) Print response status in first poll error message

2021-02-09 Thread Eddie James
In order to better debug problems starting up the driver, print the response status from the OCC in the error logged when the first poll command fails. Signed-off-by: Eddie James --- drivers/hwmon/occ/common.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers

[PATCH 1/4] fsi: occ: Don't accept response from un-initialized OCC

2021-02-09 Thread Eddie James
If the OCC is not initialized and responds as such, the driver should continue waiting for a valid response until the timeout expires. Signed-off-by: Eddie James --- drivers/fsi/fsi-occ.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/drivers/fsi/fsi-occ.c b/drivers/fsi/fsi-occ.c index

[PATCH 4.9 14/43] scsi: libfc: Avoid invoking response handler twice if ep is already completed

2021-02-08 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
From: Javed Hasan [ Upstream commit b2b0f16fa65e910a3ec8771206bb49ee87a54ac5 ] A race condition exists between the response handler getting called because of exchange_mgr_reset() (which clears out all the active XIDs) and the response we get via an interrupt. Sequence of events

[PATCH 4.4 13/38] scsi: libfc: Avoid invoking response handler twice if ep is already completed

2021-02-08 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
From: Javed Hasan [ Upstream commit b2b0f16fa65e910a3ec8771206bb49ee87a54ac5 ] A race condition exists between the response handler getting called because of exchange_mgr_reset() (which clears out all the active XIDs) and the response we get via an interrupt. Sequence of events

RE: [PATCH v2 6/9] scsi: ufshpb: Add hpb dev reset response

2021-02-07 Thread Avri Altman
> > + if (hpb->is_hcm) { > > + struct ufshpb_lu *h; > > + struct scsi_device *sdev; > > + > > + shost_for_each_device(sdev, hba->host) { > > I haven't test it yet, but this line shall cause recursive spin lock - > in current c

Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] scsi: ufshpb: Add hpb dev reset response

2021-02-07 Thread Can Guo
On 2021-02-02 16:30, Avri Altman wrote: The spec does not define what is the host's recommended response when the device send hpb dev reset response (oper 0x2). We will update all active hpb regions: mark them and do that on the next read. Signed-off-by: Avri Altman --- drivers/scs

[PATCH 4.14 11/15] scsi: libfc: Avoid invoking response handler twice if ep is already completed

2021-02-05 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
From: Javed Hasan [ Upstream commit b2b0f16fa65e910a3ec8771206bb49ee87a54ac5 ] A race condition exists between the response handler getting called because of exchange_mgr_reset() (which clears out all the active XIDs) and the response we get via an interrupt. Sequence of events

[PATCH 4.19 11/17] scsi: libfc: Avoid invoking response handler twice if ep is already completed

2021-02-05 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
From: Javed Hasan [ Upstream commit b2b0f16fa65e910a3ec8771206bb49ee87a54ac5 ] A race condition exists between the response handler getting called because of exchange_mgr_reset() (which clears out all the active XIDs) and the response we get via an interrupt. Sequence of events

[PATCH 5.10 27/57] scsi: libfc: Avoid invoking response handler twice if ep is already completed

2021-02-05 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
From: Javed Hasan [ Upstream commit b2b0f16fa65e910a3ec8771206bb49ee87a54ac5 ] A race condition exists between the response handler getting called because of exchange_mgr_reset() (which clears out all the active XIDs) and the response we get via an interrupt. Sequence of events

[PATCH 5.4 19/32] scsi: libfc: Avoid invoking response handler twice if ep is already completed

2021-02-05 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
From: Javed Hasan [ Upstream commit b2b0f16fa65e910a3ec8771206bb49ee87a54ac5 ] A race condition exists between the response handler getting called because of exchange_mgr_reset() (which clears out all the active XIDs) and the response we get via an interrupt. Sequence of events

[PATCH v2 6/9] scsi: ufshpb: Add hpb dev reset response

2021-02-02 Thread Avri Altman
The spec does not define what is the host's recommended response when the device send hpb dev reset response (oper 0x2). We will update all active hpb regions: mark them and do that on the next read. Signed-off-by: Avri Altman --- drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c

RE: [PATCH 6/8] scsi: ufshpb: Add hpb dev reset response

2021-01-31 Thread Avri Altman
> > Hi Avri, > > > + list_for_each_entry_safe(rgn, next_rgn, &lru_info->lh_lru_rgn, > > + list_lru_rgn) > How about replace list_for_each_entry_safe to list_for_each_entry? Done. Can also use the relaxed version in the timeout handler as well (patch 7/8). Thanks,

RE: [PATCH 6/8] scsi: ufshpb: Add hpb dev reset response

2021-01-31 Thread Daejun Park
Hi Avri, > + list_for_each_entry_safe(rgn, next_rgn, &lru_info->lh_lru_rgn, > + list_lru_rgn) How about replace list_for_each_entry_safe to list_for_each_entry? Thanks, Daejun

[PATCH 6/8] scsi: ufshpb: Add hpb dev reset response

2021-01-27 Thread Avri Altman
The spec does not define what is the host's recommended response when the device send hpb dev reset response (oper 0x2). We will update all active hpb regions: mark them and do that on the next read. Signed-off-by: Avri Altman --- drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c

[PATCH v2 2/2] iommu/vt-d: Use INVALID response code instead of FAILURE

2021-01-26 Thread Lu Baolu
The VT-d IOMMU response RESPONSE_FAILURE for a page request in below cases: - When it gets a Page_Request with no PASID; - When it gets a Page_Request with PASID that is not in use for this device. This is allowed by the spec, but IOMMU driver doesn't support such cases today. When the d

[PATCH 3/3] iommu/vt-d: Use INVALID response code instead of FAILURE

2021-01-20 Thread Lu Baolu
The VT-d IOMMU response RESPONSE_FAILURE for a page request in below cases: - When it gets a Page_Request with no PASID; - When it gets a Page_Request with PASID that is not in use for this device. This is allowed by the spec, but IOMMU driver doesn't support such cases today. When the d

[PATCH 5/5] soundwire: cadence: adjust verbosity in response handling

2021-01-14 Thread Bard Liao
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart There are too many logs on startup, e.g. [ 8811.851497] cdns_fill_msg_resp: 2 callbacks suppressed [ 8811.851497] intel-sdw intel-sdw.0: Msg Ack not received [ 8811.851498] intel-sdw intel-sdw.0: Msg Ack not received [ 8811.851499] intel-sdw intel-sdw.0: Msg Ack not re

[PATCH 4.9 08/45] net/ncsi: Use real net-device for response handler

2021-01-11 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
From: John Wang [ Upstream commit 427c940558560bff2583d07fc119a21094675982 ] When aggregating ncsi interfaces and dedicated interfaces to bond interfaces, the ncsi response handler will use the wrong net device to find ncsi_dev, so that the ncsi interface will not work properly. Here, we use

[PATCH 5.10 019/145] net/ncsi: Use real net-device for response handler

2021-01-11 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
From: John Wang [ Upstream commit 427c940558560bff2583d07fc119a21094675982 ] When aggregating ncsi interfaces and dedicated interfaces to bond interfaces, the ncsi response handler will use the wrong net device to find ncsi_dev, so that the ncsi interface will not work properly. Here, we use

[PATCH 5.4 24/92] net/ncsi: Use real net-device for response handler

2021-01-11 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
From: John Wang [ Upstream commit 427c940558560bff2583d07fc119a21094675982 ] When aggregating ncsi interfaces and dedicated interfaces to bond interfaces, the ncsi response handler will use the wrong net device to find ncsi_dev, so that the ncsi interface will not work properly. Here, we use

[PATCH 4.19 21/77] net/ncsi: Use real net-device for response handler

2021-01-11 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
From: John Wang [ Upstream commit 427c940558560bff2583d07fc119a21094675982 ] When aggregating ncsi interfaces and dedicated interfaces to bond interfaces, the ncsi response handler will use the wrong net device to find ncsi_dev, so that the ncsi interface will not work properly. Here, we use

[PATCH 4.14 13/57] net/ncsi: Use real net-device for response handler

2021-01-11 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
From: John Wang [ Upstream commit 427c940558560bff2583d07fc119a21094675982 ] When aggregating ncsi interfaces and dedicated interfaces to bond interfaces, the ncsi response handler will use the wrong net device to find ncsi_dev, so that the ncsi interface will not work properly. Here, we use

RE: [PATCH v11 12/13] vfio/pci: Register a DMA fault response region

2021-01-08 Thread Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
nux.intel.com; yi.l@intel.com; t...@semihalf.com; > nicoleots...@gmail.com; yuzenghui > Subject: [PATCH v11 12/13] vfio/pci: Register a DMA fault response region > > In preparation for vSVA, let's register a DMA fault response region, > where the userspace will push the page resp

[PATCH v4 5/6] scsi: ufs: Distinguish between TM request UPIU and response UPIU in TM UPIU trace

2021-01-05 Thread Bean Huo
From: Bean Huo Distinguish between TM request UPIU and response UPIU in TM UPIU trace, for the TM response, let TM UPIU trace print its TM response UPIU. Acked-by: Avri Altman Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) Signed-off-by: Bean Huo --- drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 8 ++-- 1 file

YOUR URGENT RESPONSE !!!!

2021-01-04 Thread Mr. Kim Leang
Greeting! I am contacting you to receive and share with me an abandoned fund ( $21,537.000.00 ) left in our bank by a deceased customer. I was going through the Internet search when I found your email address. My name is Mr. Kim Leang. I want to utilize this opportunity and make use of this fun

Re: [PATCH v2] net/ncsi: Use real net-device for response handler

2020-12-23 Thread patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Hello: This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (refs/heads/master): On Wed, 23 Dec 2020 13:55:23 +0800 you wrote: > When aggregating ncsi interfaces and dedicated interfaces to bond > interfaces, the ncsi response handler will use the wrong net device to > find ncsi_dev, so that

[PATCH v2] net/ncsi: Use real net-device for response handler

2020-12-22 Thread John Wang
When aggregating ncsi interfaces and dedicated interfaces to bond interfaces, the ncsi response handler will use the wrong net device to find ncsi_dev, so that the ncsi interface will not work properly. Here, we use the original net device to fix it. Fixes: 138635cc27c9 ("net/ncsi: NCSI res

Re: [External] Re: [PATCH] net/ncsi: Use real net-device for response handler

2020-12-22 Thread John Wang
ing ncsi interfaces and dedicated interfaces to bond > > > > interfaces, the ncsi response handler will use the wrong net device > > > > to > > > > find ncsi_dev, so that the ncsi interface will not work properly. > > > > Here, we use the net device register

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 111/130] iwlwifi: mvm: validate firmware sync response size

2020-12-22 Thread Sasha Levin
From: Johannes Berg [ Upstream commit b570e5b0592a56c5990ae3aa0fdb93dd9b545d43 ] We send some data to the firmware and expect to get it back, but we shouldn't really trust the firmware on this. Check the size of all the data we send down to avoid using bad or just uninitialized data when the fir

Re: [PATCH] net/ncsi: Use real net-device for response handler

2020-12-22 Thread Jakub Kicinski
On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 10:38:21 -0800 Samuel Mendoza-Jonas wrote: > On Tue, 2020-12-22 at 06:13 +, Joel Stanley wrote: > > On Sun, 20 Dec 2020 at 12:40, John Wang wrote: > > > When aggregating ncsi interfaces and dedicated interfaces to bond > > > interfaces, the ncs

Re: [PATCH] net/ncsi: Use real net-device for response handler

2020-12-22 Thread Samuel Mendoza-Jonas
On Tue, 2020-12-22 at 06:13 +, Joel Stanley wrote: > On Sun, 20 Dec 2020 at 12:40, John Wang < > wangzhiqiang...@bytedance.com> wrote: > > > > When aggregating ncsi interfaces and dedicated interfaces to bond > > interfaces, the ncsi response handler will u

Re: [PATCH] net/ncsi: Use real net-device for response handler

2020-12-21 Thread Joel Stanley
On Sun, 20 Dec 2020 at 12:40, John Wang wrote: > > When aggregating ncsi interfaces and dedicated interfaces to bond > interfaces, the ncsi response handler will use the wrong net device to > find ncsi_dev, so that the ncsi interface will not work properly. > Here, we use

[PATCH] net/ncsi: Use real net-device for response handler

2020-12-20 Thread John Wang
When aggregating ncsi interfaces and dedicated interfaces to bond interfaces, the ncsi response handler will use the wrong net device to find ncsi_dev, so that the ncsi interface will not work properly. Here, we use the net device registered to packet_type to fix it. Fixes: 138635cc27c9 (&quo

[PATCH v3 5/6] scsi: ufs: Distinguish between TM request UPIU and response UPIU in TM UPIU trace

2020-12-14 Thread Bean Huo
From: Bean Huo Distinguish between TM request UPIU and response UPIU in TM UPIU trace, for the TM response, let TM UPIU trace print its TM response UPIU. Acked-by: Avri Altman Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) Signed-off-by: Bean Huo --- drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 8 ++-- 1 file

[PATCH v2 5/6] scsi: ufs: Distinguish between TM request UPIU and response UPIU in TM UPIU trace

2020-12-14 Thread Bean Huo
From: Bean Huo Distinguish between TM request UPIU and response UPIU in TM UPIU trace, for the TM response, let TM UPIU trace print its TM response UPIU. Acked-by: Avri Altman Signed-off-by: Bean Huo --- drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 8 ++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions

Please Urgent Response

2020-12-13 Thread Dr.Kasim Mohamed
-- I am Mr Kasim Mohamed Hi Friend I am a bank director of the UBA Bank Plc bf .I want to transfer an abandoned sum of 27.5 millions USD to you through ATM VISA CARD .50% will be for you. No risk involved. Contact me for more details. Kindly reply me back to my alternative email address(mrkasimm

Response Required

2020-12-11 Thread Moussa
Greeetings from Mali. I am sorry for contacting you like this but I do have a very urgent matter that I want to discuss with you. Before I proceed, I want you to keep an open mind while reading this proposal. My name is Moussa Traore, I am the Personal Assistant to Mr. Issa Saley Maiga who was

Re: [PATCH] usb: typec: intel_pmc_mux: Use correct response message bits

2020-12-08 Thread Heikki Krogerus
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 02:08:13PM -0800, Utkarsh Patel wrote: > When Intel PMC Mux agent driver receives the response message from PMC, it > checks for the same response bits for all the mux states. > Corrected it by checking correct response message bits, Bit 8 & 9 for the &g

RE: [PATCH v1 2/3] scsi: ufs: Distinguish between TM request UPIU and response UPIU in TM UPIU trace

2020-12-06 Thread Avri Altman
> > > From: Bean Huo > > Distinguish between TM request UPIU and response UPIU in TM UPIU trace, > for the TM response, let TM UPIU trace print its TM response UPIU. > > Signed-off-by: Bean Huo Acked-by: Avri Altman Again - same comment: But you need to change the c

Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] scsi: ufs: Distinguish between TM request UPIU and response UPIU in TM UPIU trace

2020-12-06 Thread Bart Van Assche
On 12/6/20 8:42 AM, Bean Huo wrote: > From: Bean Huo > > Distinguish between TM request UPIU and response UPIU in TM UPIU trace, > for the TM response, let TM UPIU trace print its TM response UPIU. > > Signed-off-by: Bean Huo > --- > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 8 +

[PATCH v1 2/3] scsi: ufs: Distinguish between TM request UPIU and response UPIU in TM UPIU trace

2020-12-06 Thread Bean Huo
From: Bean Huo Distinguish between TM request UPIU and response UPIU in TM UPIU trace, for the TM response, let TM UPIU trace print its TM response UPIU. Signed-off-by: Bean Huo --- drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 8 ++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers

Re: [PATCH] mmc: block: Let CMD13 polling only for MMC IOCTLS with the R1B response

2020-12-04 Thread Bean Huo
On Fri, 2020-12-04 at 15:38 +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: > > There is no need to poll device status through CMD13. > > > > Meanwhile, based on the original change commit (mmc: block: Add > > CMD13 polling > > for MMC IOCTLS with R1B response), and comment in > >

Re: [PATCH] mmc: block: Let CMD13 polling only for MMC IOCTLS with the R1B response

2020-12-04 Thread Ulf Hansson
d command. > There is no need to poll device status through CMD13. > > Meanwhile, based on the original change commit (mmc: block: Add CMD13 polling > for MMC IOCTLS with R1B response), and comment in __mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(), > current code is not in line with its original purpose. So fix

Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] bus: mhi: core: Allow receiving a STOP channel command response

2020-12-03 Thread Bhaumik Bhatt
On 2020-12-02 04:15 PM, Hemant Kumar wrote: Hi Bhaumik, On 12/2/20 3:40 PM, Bhaumik Bhatt wrote: Add support to receive the response to a STOP channel command to the How about saying "Add support to send the STOP channel command ? Addressed in v4. MHI bus. If a client would like to S

[PATCH] usb: typec: intel_pmc_mux: Use correct response message bits

2020-12-03 Thread Utkarsh Patel
When Intel PMC Mux agent driver receives the response message from PMC, it checks for the same response bits for all the mux states. Corrected it by checking correct response message bits, Bit 8 & 9 for the SAFE Mode and Alternate Modes and Bit 16 & 17 for the Connect and Disconnect Modes.

Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] bus: mhi: core: Allow receiving a STOP channel command response

2020-12-02 Thread Hemant Kumar
Hi Bhaumik, On 12/2/20 3:40 PM, Bhaumik Bhatt wrote: Add support to receive the response to a STOP channel command to the How about saying "Add support to send the STOP channel command ? MHI bus. If a client would like to STOP a channel instead of issuing a RESET to it, this would pr

[PATCH v3 1/7] bus: mhi: core: Allow receiving a STOP channel command response

2020-12-02 Thread Bhaumik Bhatt
Add support to receive the response to a STOP channel command to the MHI bus. If a client would like to STOP a channel instead of issuing a RESET to it, this would provide support for it. Signed-off-by: Bhaumik Bhatt --- drivers/bus/mhi/core/main.c | 5 + 1 file changed, 5 insertions

[PATCH] mmc: block: Let CMD13 polling only for MMC IOCTLS with the R1B response

2020-12-02 Thread Bean Huo
, based on the original change commit (mmc: block: Add CMD13 polling for MMC IOCTLS with R1B response), and comment in __mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(), current code is not in line with its original purpose. So fix it with this patch. Fixes: a0d4c7eb71dd ("mmc: block: Add CMD13 polling for MMC IOCTLS wit

URGENT RESPONSE NEEDED...

2020-11-30 Thread Adams Elena
te husband has already donated a lot in this country, so you have to make sure that you use this donation fund as I have directed so that the name of the Almighty God will be glorify forever. Your urgent response is required in this matter due to my present critical condition of my health, it wa

Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] bus: mhi: core: Allow receiving a STOP channel command response

2020-11-23 Thread Bhaumik Bhatt
On 2020-11-21 09:16 AM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 09:36:09AM -0800, Bhaumik Bhatt wrote: Hi Mani, On 2020-11-15 23:13, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 11:21:08AM -0800, Bhaumik Bhatt wrote: > > Add support to receive the response

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >