Re: RFC: UML: remove MODE_TT?

2007-08-03 Thread Jeff Dike
On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 05:47:05PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > MODE_TT is still marked as broken and still not compiling... > > Will anyone fix it or can it finally be removed? I guess it should finally be removed... I have a patch which does that - I'll see how easily it moves to the bottom of

Re: RFC: UML: remove MODE_TT?

2007-08-03 Thread Jeff Dike
On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 05:47:05PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: MODE_TT is still marked as broken and still not compiling... Will anyone fix it or can it finally be removed? I guess it should finally be removed... I have a patch which does that - I'll see how easily it moves to the bottom of my

Re: RFC: UML: remove MODE_TT?

2007-07-28 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 11:18:37PM -0500, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 12:35:33AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > MODE_TT is both marked as deprecated and marked as BROKEN. > > > > Would a patch to remove MODE_TT, always enable MODE_SKAS, and doing all > > possible cleanups after

Re: RFC: UML: remove MODE_TT?

2007-07-28 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 11:18:37PM -0500, Jeff Dike wrote: On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 12:35:33AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: MODE_TT is both marked as deprecated and marked as BROKEN. Would a patch to remove MODE_TT, always enable MODE_SKAS, and doing all possible cleanups after this be

Re: RFC: UML: remove MODE_TT?

2006-12-12 Thread Jeff Dike
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 12:35:33AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > MODE_TT is both marked as deprecated and marked as BROKEN. > > Would a patch to remove MODE_TT, always enable MODE_SKAS, and doing all > possible cleanups after this be accepted? Thanks, but not yet. I've got that queued up in my

RFC: UML: remove MODE_TT?

2006-12-12 Thread Adrian Bunk
MODE_TT is both marked as deprecated and marked as BROKEN. Would a patch to remove MODE_TT, always enable MODE_SKAS, and doing all possible cleanups after this be accepted? cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been

RFC: UML: remove MODE_TT?

2006-12-12 Thread Adrian Bunk
MODE_TT is both marked as deprecated and marked as BROKEN. Would a patch to remove MODE_TT, always enable MODE_SKAS, and doing all possible cleanups after this be accepted? cu Adrian -- Is there not promise of rain? Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been

Re: RFC: UML: remove MODE_TT?

2006-12-12 Thread Jeff Dike
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 12:35:33AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: MODE_TT is both marked as deprecated and marked as BROKEN. Would a patch to remove MODE_TT, always enable MODE_SKAS, and doing all possible cleanups after this be accepted? Thanks, but not yet. I've got that queued up in my tree