Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

I updated my bmfdec.c (git://github.com/pali/bmfdec.git) and here is guessed header description: /* * BMF file is compressed by DS-01 algorithm with additional header: * 4 bytes: 46 4f 4d 42 - 'F' 'O' 'M' 'B' * 4 bytes: 01 00 00 00 - version 0x01 * 4 bytes: size of compressed data (low

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

I updated my bmfdec.c (git://github.com/pali/bmfdec.git) and here is guessed header description: /* * BMF file is compressed by DS-01 algorithm with additional header: * 4 bytes: 46 4f 4d 42 - 'F' 'O' 'M' 'B' * 4 bytes: 01 00 00 00 - version 0x01 * 4 bytes: size of compressed data (low

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 10:16 PM, wrote: >> > 46 4f 4d 42 54 15 00 00 01 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 >> > That's now FOMBT >> >> I think you just mistakenly take 0x54 as letter when it looks more like >> >> 0x1554 This one looks like offset (or size 5460) >>

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 10:16 PM, wrote: >> > 46 4f 4d 42 54 15 00 00 01 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 >> > That's now FOMBT >> >> I think you just mistakenly take 0x54 as letter when it looks more like >> >> 0x1554 This one looks like offset (or size 5460) >> 0x0001 >> 0x0001 >> >> from

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

On Tuesday 09 May 2017 21:04:15 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 9:10 PM, wrote: > >> > > Then took relevant decompression code and it really > >> > > decompressed that binary MOF WMI buffer. But still > >> > > decompressed format is binary, but I now

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

On Tuesday 09 May 2017 21:04:15 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 9:10 PM, wrote: > >> > > Then took relevant decompression code and it really > >> > > decompressed that binary MOF WMI buffer. But still > >> > > decompressed format is binary, but I now see all WMI GUID > >> > >

RE: RFC: WMI Enhancements

.kernel.org; Platform > Driver <platform-driver-...@vger.kernel.org>; linux...@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements > > On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 9:10 PM, <mario.limoncie...@dell.com> wrote: > > >> > > Then took relevant decompression code and it really

RE: RFC: WMI Enhancements

y > Lutomirski ; Andy Shevchenko > ; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Platform > Driver ; linux...@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements > > On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 9:10 PM, wrote: > > >> > > Then took relevant decompression code and it really decompressed th

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 9:10 PM, wrote: >> > > Then took relevant decompression code and it really decompressed that >> > > binary MOF WMI buffer. But still decompressed format is binary, but I >> > > now see all WMI GUID encoded in UTF-16. Decompressed BMF file has

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 9:10 PM, wrote: >> > > Then took relevant decompression code and it really decompressed that >> > > binary MOF WMI buffer. But still decompressed format is binary, but I >> > > now see all WMI GUID encoded in UTF-16. Decompressed BMF file has again >> > > "FOMB" magic

RE: RFC: WMI Enhancements

entin.ch...@gmail.com; l...@kernel.org; > andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; platform- > driver-...@vger.kernel.org; linux...@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements > > On Tuesday 09 May 2017 01:10:54 mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote: > > >

RE: RFC: WMI Enhancements

; > andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; platform- > driver-...@vger.kernel.org; linux...@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements > > On Tuesday 09 May 2017 01:10:54 mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote: > > > > > > I found dmsdos i

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

On Tuesday 09 May 2017 01:10:54 mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote: > > > > I found dmsdos implementation of that DS compression at: > > http://cmp.felk.cvut.cz/~pisa/dmsdos > > > > Then took relevant decompression code and it really decompressed that > > binary MOF WMI buffer. But still

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

On Tuesday 09 May 2017 01:10:54 mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote: > > > > I found dmsdos implementation of that DS compression at: > > http://cmp.felk.cvut.cz/~pisa/dmsdos > > > > Then took relevant decompression code and it really decompressed that > > binary MOF WMI buffer. But still

RE: RFC: WMI Enhancements

> > I found dmsdos implementation of that DS compression at: > http://cmp.felk.cvut.cz/~pisa/dmsdos > > Then took relevant decompression code and it really decompressed that > binary MOF WMI buffer. But still decompressed format is binary, but I > now see all WMI GUID encoded in UTF-16.

RE: RFC: WMI Enhancements

> > I found dmsdos implementation of that DS compression at: > http://cmp.felk.cvut.cz/~pisa/dmsdos > > Then took relevant decompression code and it really decompressed that > binary MOF WMI buffer. But still decompressed format is binary, but I > now see all WMI GUID encoded in UTF-16.

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

infradead.org; r...@rjwysocki.net; l...@amacapital.net; > > len.br...@intel.com; corentin.ch...@gmail.com; l...@kernel.org; > > andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; > > platform- driver-...@vger.kernel.org; linux...@vger.kernel.org > > Subject: Re: R

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

...@amacapital.net; > > len.br...@intel.com; corentin.ch...@gmail.com; l...@kernel.org; > > andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; > > platform- driver-...@vger.kernel.org; linux...@vger.kernel.org > > Subject: Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements > > &

RE: RFC: WMI Enhancements

entin.ch...@gmail.com; l...@kernel.org; > andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; platform- > driver-...@vger.kernel.org; linux...@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements > > On Monday 08 May 2017 21:21:45 mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote: > > > -

RE: RFC: WMI Enhancements

; > andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; platform- > driver-...@vger.kernel.org; linux...@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements > > On Monday 08 May 2017 21:21:45 mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote: > > > -Original Message- > >

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

infradead.org; r...@rjwysocki.net; l...@amacapital.net; > > len.br...@intel.com; corentin.ch...@gmail.com; l...@kernel.org; > > andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; > > platform- driver-...@vger.kernel.org; linux...@vger.kernel.org > > Subject: Re: R

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

...@amacapital.net; > > len.br...@intel.com; corentin.ch...@gmail.com; l...@kernel.org; > > andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; > > platform- driver-...@vger.kernel.org; linux...@vger.kernel.org > > Subject: Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements > > &

RE: RFC: WMI Enhancements

entin.ch...@gmail.com; l...@kernel.org; > andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; platform- > driver-...@vger.kernel.org; linux...@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements > > On Friday 05 May 2017 23:55:46 mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote: > > Unf

RE: RFC: WMI Enhancements

; > andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; platform- > driver-...@vger.kernel.org; linux...@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements > > On Friday 05 May 2017 23:55:46 mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote: > > Unfortunately the MOF data that comes

RE: RFC: WMI Enhancements

..@rjwysocki.net; len.br...@intel.com; > corentin.ch...@gmail.com; andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com; linux- > ker...@vger.kernel.org; platform-driver-...@vger.kernel.org; linux- > p...@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements > > On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 06:26:53

RE: RFC: WMI Enhancements

com; > corentin.ch...@gmail.com; andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com; linux- > ker...@vger.kernel.org; platform-driver-...@vger.kernel.org; linux- > p...@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements > > On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 06:26:53PM +, mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote:

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 06:26:53PM +, mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote: > (Responding as plain text, your email probably got punted from the ML from > being HTML) > > > > > ... > > > > I'm not sure what you are asking about. Samba does not deal with WMI at > > all. The state of affairs is

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 06:26:53PM +, mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote: > (Responding as plain text, your email probably got punted from the ML from > being HTML) > > > > > ... > > > > I'm not sure what you are asking about. Samba does not deal with WMI at > > all. The state of affairs is

RE: RFC: WMI Enhancements

(Responding as plain text, your email probably got punted from the ML from being HTML) > > ... > > I'm not sure what you are asking about. Samba does not deal with WMI at all. > The state of affairs is > explained at >

RE: RFC: WMI Enhancements

(Responding as plain text, your email probably got punted from the ML from being HTML) > > ... > > I'm not sure what you are asking about. Samba does not deal with WMI at all. > The state of affairs is > explained at >

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

On Friday 05 May 2017 23:55:46 mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote: > Unfortunately the MOF data that comes out of wmi-mof is so called > "Binary MOF" which has been pre-compiled to an intermediate format > with mofcomp.exe on Windows. The format of binary MOF is not > documented and the only known

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

On Friday 05 May 2017 23:55:46 mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote: > Unfortunately the MOF data that comes out of wmi-mof is so called > "Binary MOF" which has been pre-compiled to an intermediate format > with mofcomp.exe on Windows. The format of binary MOF is not > documented and the only known

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

+Cc: Alexander (related to Samba team I suppose, I'm sorry if I'm wrong) On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Darren Hart wrote: > On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 03:36:31PM +, mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote: >> > > > I meant that to say that at least for now Andy's wmi-mof

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

+Cc: Alexander (related to Samba team I suppose, I'm sorry if I'm wrong) On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Darren Hart wrote: > On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 03:36:31PM +, mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote: >> > > > I meant that to say that at least for now Andy's wmi-mof driver should >> > > >

RE: RFC: WMI Enhancements

corentin.ch...@gmail.com; > andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; platform- > driver-...@vger.kernel.org; linux...@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements > > On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 03:36:31PM +, mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote: > > > --

RE: RFC: WMI Enhancements

inux.intel.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; platform- > driver-...@vger.kernel.org; linux...@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements > > On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 03:36:31PM +, mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote: > > > -Original Message- > >

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

com>; > > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; > > platform-driver-...@vger.kernel.org; linux...@vger.kernel.org > > Subject: Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements > > > > On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 06:25:08PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 5:51 PM,

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

> ; Rafael J. Wysocki ; Len Brown > > ; Corentin Chary ; Andy > > Shevchenko ; > > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; > > platform-driver-...@vger.kernel.org; linux...@vger.kernel.org > > Subject: Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements > > > > On Fri, May 05, 2017 at

RE: RFC: WMI Enhancements

ocki <r...@rjwysocki.net>; Len Brown > <len.br...@intel.com>; Corentin Chary <corentin.ch...@gmail.com>; Andy > Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com>; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; > platform-driver-...@vger.kernel.org; linux...@vger.kernel.org > Subject:

RE: RFC: WMI Enhancements

r.kernel.org; > platform-driver-...@vger.kernel.org; linux...@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements > > On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 06:25:08PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 5:51 PM, wrote: > > >> -Original Message- > > &g

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

ernel.org; platform- > >> driver-...@vger.kernel.org; linux...@vger.kernel.org > >> Subject: Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements > > > > I meant that to say that at least for now Andy's wmi-mof driver should > > still be merged. > > If something is going to build

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

Mario > >> Cc: pali.ro...@gmail.com; r...@rjwysocki.net; l...@amacapital.net; > >> len.br...@intel.com; corentin.ch...@gmail.com; l...@kernel.org; > >> andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; platform- > >> driver-...@vger.kernel.org; linux..

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

ali.ro...@gmail.com; r...@rjwysocki.net; l...@amacapital.net; >> len.br...@intel.com; corentin.ch...@gmail.com; l...@kernel.org; >> andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; platform- >> driver-...@vger.kernel.org; linux...@vger.kernel.org >> Subject: Re: R

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

gt; len.br...@intel.com; corentin.ch...@gmail.com; l...@kernel.org; >> andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; platform- >> driver-...@vger.kernel.org; linux...@vger.kernel.org >> Subject: Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements > I meant that to say that at leas

RE: RFC: WMI Enhancements

entin.ch...@gmail.com; l...@kernel.org; > andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; platform- > driver-...@vger.kernel.org; linux...@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements > > On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 09:55:46PM +, mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote: >

RE: RFC: WMI Enhancements

; > andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; platform- > driver-...@vger.kernel.org; linux...@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements > > On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 09:55:46PM +, mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote: > > > -Original Messag

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

o, Mario <mario_limoncie...@dell.com>; r...@rjwysocki.net; > > l...@amacapital.net; len.br...@intel.com; corentin.ch...@gmail.com; > > l...@kernel.org; andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com; linux- > > ker...@vger.kernel.org; platform-driver-...@vger.kernel.org; linux- >

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

i.net; > > l...@amacapital.net; len.br...@intel.com; corentin.ch...@gmail.com; > > l...@kernel.org; andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com; linux- > > ker...@vger.kernel.org; platform-driver-...@vger.kernel.org; linux- > > p...@vger.kernel.org > > Subject: Re: RFC: WMI Enhancem

RE: RFC: WMI Enhancements

n.br...@intel.com; corentin.ch...@gmail.com; > l...@kernel.org; andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com; linux- > ker...@vger.kernel.org; platform-driver-...@vger.kernel.org; linux- > p...@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements > > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 03:14:31PM +0200, Pali R

RE: RFC: WMI Enhancements

l.org; andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com; linux- > ker...@vger.kernel.org; platform-driver-...@vger.kernel.org; linux- > p...@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements > > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 03:14:31PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Wednesday 19 April 2017

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

ernel@vger.kernel.org; platform- > > > driver-...@vger.kernel.org; linux...@vger.kernel.org > > > Subject: Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements > > > > > > On Wednesday 19 April 2017 18:29:53 mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote: > > > > > As wrote above,

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

> driver-...@vger.kernel.org; linux...@vger.kernel.org > > > Subject: Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements > > > > > > On Wednesday 19 April 2017 18:29:53 mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote: > > > > > As wrote above, I'm fine with explicit whitelist of WMI GUIDs whi

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

With Andy's conversion of WMI to the driver model the GUIDs should be our device ids. Which means WMI can support the dynamic device ID model, where you can echo a id to sysfs to bind an id - that way people could add the GUIDs on demand to the pass through driver if they need them even with the

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

With Andy's conversion of WMI to the driver model the GUIDs should be our device ids. Which means WMI can support the dynamic device ID model, where you can echo a id to sysfs to bind an id - that way people could add the GUIDs on demand to the pass through driver if they need them even with the

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

gt; > Cc: dvh...@infradead.org; r...@rjwysocki.net; l...@amacapital.net; > > len.br...@intel.com; corentin.ch...@gmail.com; l...@kernel.org; > > andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; platform- > > driver-...@vger.kernel.org; linux...@vger.kernel.org > > Subje

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

socki.net; l...@amacapital.net; > > len.br...@intel.com; corentin.ch...@gmail.com; l...@kernel.org; > > andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; platform- > > driver-...@vger.kernel.org; linux...@vger.kernel.org > > Subject: Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements >

RE: RFC: WMI Enhancements

entin.ch...@gmail.com; l...@kernel.org; > andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; platform- > driver-...@vger.kernel.org; linux...@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements > > On Wednesday 19 April 2017 18:29:53 mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote: >

RE: RFC: WMI Enhancements

; > andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; platform- > driver-...@vger.kernel.org; linux...@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements > > On Wednesday 19 April 2017 18:29:53 mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote: > > > As wrote above, I'm

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

On Wednesday 19 April 2017 18:29:53 mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote: > > As wrote above, I'm fine with explicit whitelist of WMI GUIDs which > > will be exported to userspace after communication with vendor. > > What about GUID's not yet used by kernel drivers? Would those > default to

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

On Wednesday 19 April 2017 18:29:53 mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote: > > As wrote above, I'm fine with explicit whitelist of WMI GUIDs which > > will be exported to userspace after communication with vendor. > > What about GUID's not yet used by kernel drivers? Would those > default to

RE: RFC: WMI Enhancements

lt;len.br...@intel.com>; Corentin Chary > <corentin.ch...@gmail.com>; Limonciello, Mario <mario_limoncie...@dell.com>; > Andy Lutomirski <l...@kernel.org>; Andy Shevchenko > <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com>; LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; > p

RE: RFC: WMI Enhancements

ko > ; LKML ; > platform-driver-...@vger.kernel.org; linux...@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements > > On Tuesday 18 April 2017 15:49:31 Darren Hart wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 09:28:36PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > And still, if write audit fil

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

On Tuesday 18 April 2017 15:49:31 Darren Hart wrote: > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 09:28:36PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > > And still, if write audit filters for every one existing wmi driver in > > kernel, there still audit filter can say to userspace that current > > request cannot be accepted and

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

On Tuesday 18 April 2017 15:49:31 Darren Hart wrote: > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 09:28:36PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > > And still, if write audit filters for every one existing wmi driver in > > kernel, there still audit filter can say to userspace that current > > request cannot be accepted and

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 09:28:36PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Tuesday 18 April 2017 18:33:25 Darren Hart wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 03:07:06PM +0200, Rafael Wysocki wrote: > > > On Monday, April 17, 2017 04:10:51 PM Darren Hart wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 03:03:29PM -0700,

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 09:28:36PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Tuesday 18 April 2017 18:33:25 Darren Hart wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 03:07:06PM +0200, Rafael Wysocki wrote: > > > On Monday, April 17, 2017 04:10:51 PM Darren Hart wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 03:03:29PM -0700,

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 6:33 PM, Darren Hart wrote: > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 03:07:06PM +0200, Rafael Wysocki wrote: >> On Monday, April 17, 2017 04:10:51 PM Darren Hart wrote: >> > On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 03:03:29PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> > > On Fri, Apr 14, 2017

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 6:33 PM, Darren Hart wrote: > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 03:07:06PM +0200, Rafael Wysocki wrote: >> On Monday, April 17, 2017 04:10:51 PM Darren Hart wrote: >> > On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 03:03:29PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> > > On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Darren

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

On Tuesday 18 April 2017 18:56:31 Darren Hart wrote: > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 09:54:01AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Thursday 13 April 2017 17:39:56 mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote: > > > > > No more than exists today with the dcdbas SMI interface > > > > > (which only if you manually run

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

On Tuesday 18 April 2017 18:56:31 Darren Hart wrote: > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 09:54:01AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Thursday 13 April 2017 17:39:56 mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote: > > > > > No more than exists today with the dcdbas SMI interface > > > > > (which only if you manually run

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

On Tuesday 18 April 2017 18:33:25 Darren Hart wrote: > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 03:07:06PM +0200, Rafael Wysocki wrote: > > On Monday, April 17, 2017 04:10:51 PM Darren Hart wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 03:03:29PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Darren

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

On Tuesday 18 April 2017 18:33:25 Darren Hart wrote: > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 03:07:06PM +0200, Rafael Wysocki wrote: > > On Monday, April 17, 2017 04:10:51 PM Darren Hart wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 03:03:29PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Darren

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 09:54:01AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Thursday 13 April 2017 17:39:56 mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote: > > > > No more than exists today with the dcdbas SMI interface (which > > > > only if you manually run userspace tools that manipulate the same > > > > data you can

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 09:54:01AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Thursday 13 April 2017 17:39:56 mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote: > > > > No more than exists today with the dcdbas SMI interface (which > > > > only if you manually run userspace tools that manipulate the same > > > > data you can

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 03:07:06PM +0200, Rafael Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, April 17, 2017 04:10:51 PM Darren Hart wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 03:03:29PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Darren Hart wrote: > > > > On Sat, Apr 15,

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 03:07:06PM +0200, Rafael Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, April 17, 2017 04:10:51 PM Darren Hart wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 03:03:29PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Darren Hart wrote: > > > > On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 12:45:30AM

RE: RFC: WMI Enhancements

dvh...@infradead.org; r...@rjwysocki.net; > len.br...@intel.com; corentin.ch...@gmail.com; l...@kernel.org; linux- > ker...@vger.kernel.org; platform-driver-...@vger.kernel.org; linux- > p...@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements > > On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 15:40 +, mario.l

RE: RFC: WMI Enhancements

; len.br...@intel.com; corentin.ch...@gmail.com; l...@kernel.org; linux- > ker...@vger.kernel.org; platform-driver-...@vger.kernel.org; linux- > p...@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements > > On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 15:40 +, mario.limoncie...@dell.com

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

On Monday, April 17, 2017 04:10:51 PM Darren Hart wrote: > On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 03:03:29PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Darren Hart wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 12:45:30AM +0200, Rafael Wysocki wrote: > > >> On Wednesday,

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

On Monday, April 17, 2017 04:10:51 PM Darren Hart wrote: > On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 03:03:29PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Darren Hart wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 12:45:30AM +0200, Rafael Wysocki wrote: > > >> On Wednesday, April 12, 2017 04:08:54 PM

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

On Thursday 13 April 2017 17:39:56 mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote: > > > No more than exists today with the dcdbas SMI interface (which > > > only if you manually run userspace tools that manipulate the same > > > data you can do that technically). > > > > > > We're all reasonable folks, if

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

On Thursday 13 April 2017 17:39:56 mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote: > > > No more than exists today with the dcdbas SMI interface (which > > > only if you manually run userspace tools that manipulate the same > > > data you can do that technically). > > > > > > We're all reasonable folks, if

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 15:40 +, mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote: > > libsmbios would benefit. > > > > Really libsmbios matters here? Hans (added to thread) wrote that > > libsmbios is > > a relic, something of ages long gone by and a normal user should > > never use it. > > > > A normal

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 15:40 +, mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote: > > libsmbios would benefit. > > > > Really libsmbios matters here? Hans (added to thread) wrote that > > libsmbios is > > a relic, something of ages long gone by and a normal user should > > never use it. > > > > A normal

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 03:03:29PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Darren Hart wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 12:45:30AM +0200, Rafael Wysocki wrote: > >> On Wednesday, April 12, 2017 04:08:54 PM Darren Hart wrote: > >> > Hi All, > >> > >

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 03:03:29PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Darren Hart wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 12:45:30AM +0200, Rafael Wysocki wrote: > >> On Wednesday, April 12, 2017 04:08:54 PM Darren Hart wrote: > >> > Hi All, > >> > > >> > There are a few

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Darren Hart wrote: > On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 12:45:30AM +0200, Rafael Wysocki wrote: >> On Wednesday, April 12, 2017 04:08:54 PM Darren Hart wrote: >> > Hi All, >> > >> > There are a few parallel efforts involving the Windows Management >> >

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Darren Hart wrote: > On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 12:45:30AM +0200, Rafael Wysocki wrote: >> On Wednesday, April 12, 2017 04:08:54 PM Darren Hart wrote: >> > Hi All, >> > >> > There are a few parallel efforts involving the Windows Management >> > Instrumentation

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 12:45:30AM +0200, Rafael Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday, April 12, 2017 04:08:54 PM Darren Hart wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > There are a few parallel efforts involving the Windows Management > > Instrumentation (WMI)[1] and dependent/related drivers. I'd like to have a > >

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 12:45:30AM +0200, Rafael Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday, April 12, 2017 04:08:54 PM Darren Hart wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > There are a few parallel efforts involving the Windows Management > > Instrumentation (WMI)[1] and dependent/related drivers. I'd like to have a > >

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

On Wednesday, April 12, 2017 04:08:54 PM Darren Hart wrote: > Hi All, > > There are a few parallel efforts involving the Windows Management > Instrumentation (WMI)[1] and dependent/related drivers. I'd like to have a > round of > discussion among those of you that have been involved in this

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

On Wednesday, April 12, 2017 04:08:54 PM Darren Hart wrote: > Hi All, > > There are a few parallel efforts involving the Windows Management > Instrumentation (WMI)[1] and dependent/related drivers. I'd like to have a > round of > discussion among those of you that have been involved in this

RE: RFC: WMI Enhancements

ail.com; l...@kernel.org; andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com; > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; platform-driver-...@vger.kernel.org; linux- > p...@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements > > On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 05:42:03PM +, mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote: > > > >

RE: RFC: WMI Enhancements

..@linux.intel.com; > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; platform-driver-...@vger.kernel.org; linux- > p...@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements > > On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 05:42:03PM +, mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote: > > > > > > > -Ori

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

> > > Cc: pali.ro...@gmail.com; r...@rjwysocki.net; len.br...@intel.com; > > corentin.ch...@gmail.com; l...@kernel.org; > > andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com; > > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; platform-driver-...@vger.kernel.org; linux- > > p...@vger.kernel.org &g

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

mail.com; r...@rjwysocki.net; len.br...@intel.com; > > corentin.ch...@gmail.com; l...@kernel.org; > > andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com; > > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; platform-driver-...@vger.kernel.org; linux- > > p...@vger.kernel.org > > Subject: Re: RFC:

RE: RFC: WMI Enhancements

ail.com; l...@kernel.org; andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com; > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; platform-driver-...@vger.kernel.org; linux- > p...@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 08:38:28PM +, mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote: > > Earli

RE: RFC: WMI Enhancements

..@linux.intel.com; > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; platform-driver-...@vger.kernel.org; linux- > p...@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 08:38:28PM +, mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote: > > Earlier question from Andy. I ha

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 08:38:28PM +, mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote: > Earlier question from Andy. I had some discussion with the right people > about this. > > > Is it just the "call SMBIOS" GUID or are there other things? > > Today - it's just the SMBIOS calling GUID. There are plans

Re: RFC: WMI Enhancements

On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 08:38:28PM +, mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote: > Earlier question from Andy. I had some discussion with the right people > about this. > > > Is it just the "call SMBIOS" GUID or are there other things? > > Today - it's just the SMBIOS calling GUID. There are plans

  1   2   >