Rui Sousa wrote:
> How about keeping master volume to 0 while you mess up the other
> registers?
Not a bad idea. 0x8000, so it's muted as well as volume 0.
> And it's not a scaling problem? (wrong number of precision bits)
It might be scaling bug, but I'm pretty certain the number of precision
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Rui Sousa wrote:
> > On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > > We need the dynamic bit resolution detection.
>
> > Isn't this producing noise/pops? (since you maximize the volume).
>
> During audio init I hear pops, but then again I heard pops durin
Rui Sousa wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > We need the dynamic bit resolution detection.
> Isn't this producing noise/pops? (since you maximize the volume).
During audio init I hear pops, but then again I heard pops during audio
init before these changes too :)
> > Judging
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> It's a big update, but I think it is necessary.
> We need the new codec-specific init functions.
> We need the new ac97-valid-reg checking.
> We need the dynamic bit resolution detection.
Isn't this producing noise/pops? (since you maximize the volume).
It's a big update, but I think it is necessary.
We need the new codec-specific init functions.
We need the new ac97-valid-reg checking.
We need the dynamic bit resolution detection.
Full change description, and tested patch against 2.4.0-test10-pre4,
follows. This includes some interface changes
5 matches
Mail list logo
