Re: RFC: removing DONGLE_OLD drivers?

2007-07-12 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Adrian, On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 07:25:39PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > With one exception, all DONGLE_OLD drivers have newer counterparts. > > The DONGLE_OLD drivers depend on BROKEN_ON_SMP which e.g. implies that > the many distributions shipping only SMP-kernels will never offer them. > >

Re: RFC: removing DONGLE_OLD drivers?

2007-07-12 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Adrian, On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 07:25:39PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: With one exception, all DONGLE_OLD drivers have newer counterparts. The DONGLE_OLD drivers depend on BROKEN_ON_SMP which e.g. implies that the many distributions shipping only SMP-kernels will never offer them. The

RFC: removing DONGLE_OLD drivers?

2007-07-09 Thread Adrian Bunk
With one exception, all DONGLE_OLD drivers have newer counterparts. The DONGLE_OLD drivers depend on BROKEN_ON_SMP which e.g. implies that the many distributions shipping only SMP-kernels will never offer them. The one exception is a driver for the Cirrus Logic EDB-7211 evaluation board that

RFC: removing DONGLE_OLD drivers?

2007-07-09 Thread Adrian Bunk
With one exception, all DONGLE_OLD drivers have newer counterparts. The DONGLE_OLD drivers depend on BROKEN_ON_SMP which e.g. implies that the many distributions shipping only SMP-kernels will never offer them. The one exception is a driver for the Cirrus Logic EDB-7211 evaluation board that