On Saturday 24 March 2007 04:57, Tim Chen wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 13:40 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > Volanomark is a purely yield() semantic dependant workload (as
> > discussed many times previously). In the earlier form of RSDL I
> > softened the effect of sched_yield but other changes
On Saturday 24 March 2007 04:57, Tim Chen wrote:
On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 13:40 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
Volanomark is a purely yield() semantic dependant workload (as
discussed many times previously). In the earlier form of RSDL I
softened the effect of sched_yield but other changes since
On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 13:40 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
>
> Volanomark is a purely yield() semantic dependant workload (as
> discussed many times previously). In the earlier form of RSDL I
> softened the effect of sched_yield but other changes since then have
> made that softness bordering on a
On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 13:40 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
Volanomark is a purely yield() semantic dependant workload (as
discussed many times previously). In the earlier form of RSDL I
softened the effect of sched_yield but other changes since then have
made that softness bordering on a noop.
On 23/03/07, Tim Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Con,
I've tried running Volanomark and found a 80% regression
with RSDL 0.31 scheduler on 2.6.21-rc4 on a 2 socket Core 2 quad cpu
system (4 cpus per socket, 8 cpus for system).
The results are sensitive to rr_interval. Using Con's patch to
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 01:21:46PM -0800, Tim Chen wrote:
> I've tried running Volanomark and found a 80% regression
> with RSDL 0.31 scheduler on 2.6.21-rc4 on a 2 socket Core 2 quad cpu
> system (4 cpus per socket, 8 cpus for system).
> The results are sensitive to rr_interval. Using Con's
Con,
I've tried running Volanomark and found a 80% regression
with RSDL 0.31 scheduler on 2.6.21-rc4 on a 2 socket Core 2 quad cpu
system (4 cpus per socket, 8 cpus for system).
The results are sensitive to rr_interval. Using Con's patch to increase
rr_interval to a large value of 100,
the
Con,
I've tried running Volanomark and found a 80% regression
with RSDL 0.31 scheduler on 2.6.21-rc4 on a 2 socket Core 2 quad cpu
system (4 cpus per socket, 8 cpus for system).
The results are sensitive to rr_interval. Using Con's patch to increase
rr_interval to a large value of 100,
the
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 01:21:46PM -0800, Tim Chen wrote:
I've tried running Volanomark and found a 80% regression
with RSDL 0.31 scheduler on 2.6.21-rc4 on a 2 socket Core 2 quad cpu
system (4 cpus per socket, 8 cpus for system).
The results are sensitive to rr_interval. Using Con's patch to
On 23/03/07, Tim Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Con,
I've tried running Volanomark and found a 80% regression
with RSDL 0.31 scheduler on 2.6.21-rc4 on a 2 socket Core 2 quad cpu
system (4 cpus per socket, 8 cpus for system).
The results are sensitive to rr_interval. Using Con's patch to
10 matches
Mail list logo