Re: "Unable to handle kernel paging request" x 3

2001-02-21 Thread Keith Owens
On Wed, 21 Feb 2001 13:47:21 -0300 (ARST), Alberto Bertogli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Kernel panic: Attemped to kill the idle task! >In idle task - not syncing > >This last line doesn't appear on the ksymoops report, i really dont know why it >insists on cutting it. Because it has nothing to

Re: "Unable to handle kernel paging request" x 3

2001-02-21 Thread Brian Gerst
Alberto Bertogli wrote: > > This is the 3rd day in a row i got an oops. > The only difference this time was the machine had one postgresql running, with > mailsnarf, vmstat, apache and inetd; without any load. > > The oops (passed through ksymoops 2.4) is attached, with the dmesg. > > Linux sol

Re: "Unable to handle kernel paging request" x 3

2001-02-21 Thread Alberto Bertogli
Quoting Brian Gerst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > This one just looks really odd. I can't figure out where the faulting > address (0x9fac) is coming from. It's not from the ret > instruction, > which should be getting a valid return address off the stack. Do you > still have the raw oops messa