Re: Re: (ltc-kernel 10162) Re: [PATCH ftrace/for-next v6] ftracetest: Add POSIX.3 standard and XFAIL result codes

2014-10-04 Thread Masami Hiramatsu
(2014/10/04 5:53), Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Fri, 03 Oct 2014 20:29:12 +0900 > Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > >> Ping? :) > > Just to make sure. This is just the one patch that I missed before, > right? Yes, this one is the last patch in previous series. > > I pulled it and now testing it (runnin

Re: (ltc-kernel 10162) Re: [PATCH ftrace/for-next v6] ftracetest: Add POSIX.3 standard and XFAIL result codes

2014-10-03 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Fri, 03 Oct 2014 20:29:12 +0900 Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > Ping? :) Just to make sure. This is just the one patch that I missed before, right? I pulled it and now testing it (running the tests). I'll push it to my linux-next branch sometime later today. You'll probably see it as you wake up ;

Re: (ltc-kernel 10162) Re: [PATCH ftrace/for-next v6] ftracetest: Add POSIX.3 standard and XFAIL result codes

2014-10-03 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Fri, 03 Oct 2014 20:29:12 +0900 Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > Ping? :) Haven't forgotten you. It's still a top priority. I was working on something else and hit a bug that's in mainline with the ring buffer. It's a hard to hit race and it took a while to bisect, but I finally found the cause and

Re: (ltc-kernel 10162) Re: [PATCH ftrace/for-next v6] ftracetest: Add POSIX.3 standard and XFAIL result codes

2014-10-03 Thread Masami Hiramatsu
Ping? :) (2014/09/29 21:11), Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > Steven, could you pick this instead of old v5 patch? > > As you pointed, this version shows the log of "unsuppoted" test result. > > Thank you, > > (2014/09/29 21:02), Masami Hiramatsu wrote: >> Add XFAIL and POSIX 1003.3 standard codes (UN