Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

2015-07-03 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Jul 3, 2015 1:43 AM, "David Herrmann" wrote: > > Hi > > On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 2:39 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > Problem 1: Booting a kdbus-enabled kernel (CONFIG_KDBUS=y) causes gdm > > to bail saying "oops, something went wrong" or whatever the useless > > standard error message is. > > >

Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

2015-07-03 Thread Richard Weinberger
Am 03.07.2015 um 17:27 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman: > On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 10:53:57AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 10:43 AM, David Herrmann >> wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 2:39 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: Problem 1: Booting a kdbus-enabled kern

Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

2015-07-03 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 10:53:57AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: > On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 10:43 AM, David Herrmann wrote: > > Hi > > > > On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 2:39 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > >> Problem 1: Booting a kdbus-enabled kernel (CONFIG_KDBUS=y) causes gdm > >> to bail saying "oops,

Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

2015-07-03 Thread Richard Weinberger
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 10:43 AM, David Herrmann wrote: > Hi > > On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 2:39 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> Problem 1: Booting a kdbus-enabled kernel (CONFIG_KDBUS=y) causes gdm >> to bail saying "oops, something went wrong" or whatever the useless >> standard error message is. >> >

Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

2015-07-03 Thread David Herrmann
Hi On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 2:39 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > Problem 1: Booting a kdbus-enabled kernel (CONFIG_KDBUS=y) causes gdm > to bail saying "oops, something went wrong" or whatever the useless > standard error message is. > > I can work around problem 1 by booting with kdbus=1, but that's

Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

2015-07-02 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:33 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> What's a good distro on which to poke at a full running system? > > Fedora Rawhide is probably currently your best bet. I won't swear that all of the problems I'm seeing are 100% k

Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

2015-07-01 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 05:55:47PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote: > Hi > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 8:29 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote: > > Where does (or did?) the development happen? > > So far development happened at conferences, on Freenode #kdbus, and in > personal meetings. > So the code is

Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

2015-07-01 Thread David Herrmann
Hi On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 8:29 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Where does (or did?) the development happen? So far development happened at conferences, on Freenode #kdbus, and in personal meetings. Thanks David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the b

Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

2015-06-29 Thread Richard Weinberger
Am 30.06.2015 um 03:06 schrieb chunshan.zhu: > David's out tree modules kdbus tree > > > https://github.com/systemd/kdbus Thank you Chunshan, but this does not an answer to my questions. Let's try again. ;) Where does (or did?) the development happen? Will it happen on LKML in future? Is there

Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

2015-06-29 Thread chunshan.zhu
David's out tree modules kdbus tree https://github.com/systemd/kdbus On 06/29/2015 11:47 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: Am 29.06.2015 um 17:45 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman: On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 04:10:27PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: Greg, On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Greg Kroah-Har

Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

2015-06-29 Thread Richard Weinberger
Am 29.06.2015 um 17:45 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman: > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 04:10:27PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: >> Greg, >> >> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman >> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Given the email threads about kdbus this week from various community >>> members

Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

2015-06-29 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 04:10:27PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Greg, > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Given the email threads about kdbus this week from various community > > members, I figured it would be good to let people know what was

Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

2015-06-29 Thread Richard Weinberger
Greg, On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > Hi all, > > Given the email threads about kdbus this week from various community > members, I figured it would be good to let people know what was going on > with things at the moment. > > We (David, Daniel, Djalal, and myself) do

Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

2015-06-28 Thread Richard Weinberger
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:36 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:33 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> What's a good distro on which to poke at a full running system? > > Fedora Rawhide is probably currently your best bet. > >> Fedora Rawhide seems to still build systemd with --disabl

Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

2015-06-26 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:33 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > What's a good distro on which to poke at a full running system? Fedora Rawhide is probably currently your best bet. > Fedora Rawhide seems to still build systemd with --disable-kdbus, > although I suppose that means that I could boot it w

Re: [!GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.2

2015-06-26 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > Hi all, > > Given the email threads about kdbus this week from various community > members, I figured it would be good to let people know what was going on > with things at the moment. > > We (David, Daniel, Djalal, and myself) do not n