Re: [-next]: s390 *_irq() link errors

2012-09-30 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Jean Delvare wrote: > On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 11:35:41 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Jean Delvare wrote: >> > On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 11:08:41 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> >> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Jean Delvare w

Re: [-next]: s390 *_irq() link errors

2012-09-30 Thread Jean Delvare
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 11:35:41 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Jean Delvare wrote: > > On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 11:08:41 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Jean Delvare wrote: > >> > I thought we were trying to move away from expl

Re: [-next]: s390 *_irq() link errors

2012-09-30 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Jean Delvare wrote: > On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 11:08:41 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Jean Delvare wrote: >> > I thought we were trying to move away from explicit arch exclusions, >> > but if S390 is special then fine with me. I

Re: [-next]: s390 *_irq() link errors

2012-09-30 Thread Jean Delvare
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 11:08:41 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Jean Delvare wrote: > > I thought we were trying to move away from explicit arch exclusions, > > but if S390 is special then fine with me. I've folded Heiko's fix into > > "depends on GENERIC_HARDIRQ

Re: [-next]: s390 *_irq() link errors

2012-09-30 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Jean Delvare wrote: > On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 18:39:13 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Heiko Carstens >> > From 24c68e72b6198b8412a8605fac7d9c90796502ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> > From: Heiko Carstens >> > Date: Thu, 27 Sep 201

Re: [-next]: s390 *_irq() link errors

2012-09-30 Thread Jean Delvare
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 18:39:13 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Heiko Carstens > > From 24c68e72b6198b8412a8605fac7d9c90796502ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Heiko Carstens > > Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 13:37:14 +0200 > > Subject: [PATCH] i2c: Make I2C unavailab

Re: [-next]: s390 *_irq() link errors

2012-09-29 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Heiko, On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Heiko Carstens wrote: > On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 09:07:54PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> After applying http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-next/msg21973.html, >> the s390 allmodconfig build in linux-next fails in the linking stage with: >> >> ERROR

Re: [-next]: s390 *_irq() link errors

2012-09-27 Thread Heiko Carstens
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 09:07:54PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > After applying http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-next/msg21973.html, > the s390 allmodconfig build in linux-next fails in the linking stage with: > > ERROR: "free_irq" [drivers/power/smb347-charger.ko] undefined! > ERROR: "free