On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 06:34:48PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 10:01:13AM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> > On 10/03/2012 09:01 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > >Hi Ben,
> > >
> > >On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 03:50:14PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > >>On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 00:52 +02
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 10:01:13AM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> On 10/03/2012 09:01 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> >Hi Ben,
> >
> >On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 03:50:14PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >>On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 00:52 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> >>>2.6.32-longterm review patch. If anyone has
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 10:01:13AM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> On 10/03/2012 09:01 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> >Hi Ben,
> >
> >On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 03:50:14PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >>On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 00:52 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> >>>2.6.32-longterm review patch. If anyone has
On 10/03/2012 09:01 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Ben,
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 03:50:14PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 00:52 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
2.6.32-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
[...]
No objection, but please remove t
Hi Ben,
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 03:50:14PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 00:52 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > 2.6.32-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me
> > know.
> [...]
>
> No objection, but please remove the '2.6.32.x: ' prefix from the s
On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 00:52 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> 2.6.32-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me
> know.
[...]
No objection, but please remove the '2.6.32.x: ' prefix from the subject
before committing this and the other ntp/timekeeping/hrtimer fixes.
Ben.
--
6 matches
Mail list logo