Re: [000/118] 3.2.45-rc1 review

2013-05-12 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2013-05-12 at 10:31 +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > Hi Ben, > > On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 02:39:39PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.45 release. > > There are 118 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses > > to this

Re: [000/118] 3.2.45-rc1 review

2013-05-12 Thread Sebastian Reichel
Hi Ben, On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 02:39:39PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.45 release. > There are 118 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me

Re: [000/118] 3.2.45-rc1 review

2013-05-11 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sat, 2013-05-11 at 21:05 +0900, Satoru Takeuchi wrote: > At Fri, 10 May 2013 14:39:39 +0100, > Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.45 release. > > There are 118 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses > > to this one. If anyon

Re: [000/118] 3.2.45-rc1 review

2013-05-11 Thread Satoru Takeuchi
At Fri, 10 May 2013 14:39:39 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.45 release. > There are 118 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > >