Re: [2.6 patch] the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI

2007-07-02 Thread Dave Jones
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 03:06:11AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > @@ -65,1 +60,1 @@ > > > - depends on X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ || X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI || > > X86_POWERNOW_K8_ACPI > > > + depends on X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ || X86_POWERNOW_K8_ACPI > > > --- > > linux-2.6.20-mm1/arc

Re: [2.6 patch] the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI

2007-07-02 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 08:36:48PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 01:43:13AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > Applying '[CPUFREQ] the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI' > > > > > > error: patch failed: arch/x86_64/kernel/cpufreq/Kconfig:65 > > > error: arch/x86_

Re: [2.6 patch] the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI

2007-07-02 Thread Dave Jones
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 01:43:13AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Applying '[CPUFREQ] the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI' > > > > error: patch failed: arch/x86_64/kernel/cpufreq/Kconfig:65 > > error: arch/x86_64/kernel/cpufreq/Kconfig: patch does not apply > > I made the patc

Re: [2.6 patch] the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI

2007-07-02 Thread Dave Jones
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 10:20:37PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: Hi Adrian, > This patch contains the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI. > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Acked-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Acked-by: Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [2.6 patch] the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI

2007-04-06 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 06:30:58PM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: > Adrian Bunk wrote: > >This patch contains the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI. > > > >Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > It would be really nice, when removing features used on computers which > are o

Re: [2.6 patch] the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI

2007-04-06 Thread Bill Davidsen
Adrian Bunk wrote: This patch contains the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> It would be really nice, when removing features used on computers which are only a few years old, if you noted what replaces this functionality. Yes, peopl

Re: [2.6 patch] the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI

2007-04-06 Thread Dave Jones
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 06:38:25AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Dave Jones wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 12:19:28PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > This patch contains the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk

Re: [2.6 patch] the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI

2007-04-06 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Dave Jones wrote: > On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 12:19:28PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > This patch contains the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI. > > > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Acked-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > lets

Re: [2.6 patch] the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI

2007-04-06 Thread Dave Jones
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 12:19:28PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > This patch contains the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI. > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Acked-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> lets kill this in 2.6.22 Dave -- http://www

RE: [2.6 patch] the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI

2007-02-24 Thread Pallipadi, Venkatesh
Ack. Dave: Can you add this patch to cpufreq.git -> mm. Thanks, Venki >-Original Message- >From: Adrian Bunk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 4:07 PM >To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; >linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >Subject: