On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 06:00:00PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 17:46:13 -0700 "Wessel, Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> > > Everything went quiet?
> > >
> > > If this patch has been tested and fixes the bug, can you
> > > please send a version which is ready for mergi
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 17:46:13 -0700 "Wessel, Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > }
> > > }
> >
> > Everything went quiet?
> >
> > If this patch has been tested and fixes the bug, can you
> > please send a version which is ready for merging? (ie: add a
> > suitab
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Morton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > diff -Nurp 2.6.21-/net/core/netpoll.c 2.6.21/net/core/netpoll.c
> > --- 2.6.21-/net/core/netpoll.c 2007-04-26
> 15:08:32.0
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 11:25:37 +0200
Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 01:02:33PM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> ...
> > Of course such a problem should preferably be fixed by somebody who
> > knows the code (alas I don't know netconsole), to be sure all needed
>
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 01:02:33PM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
...
> Of course such a problem should preferably be fixed by somebody who
> knows the code (alas I don't know netconsole), to be sure all needed
> cancels are still done after this change. I hope Jason's patch is
> right but I'm a lit
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 12:56:28AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 26 May 2007 17:40:12 +0200 Folkert van Heusden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > When trying to remove the netconsole module, I got the following kernel
> > output after a while (couple of minutes iirc):
> >
> > [525720.11
This patch seems to solve the problem.
I removed (and inserted) the module twice without any oopses or panics
or hangs in general.
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 08:28:09AM -0500, Jason Wessel wrote:
>
> Attached is a patch to fix the soft lockup problem when removing the
> netconsole module.
>
> It loo
Attached is a patch to fix the soft lockup problem when removing the
netconsole module.
It looks different than the original patch I posted because the context
had to change to maintain 80 column code. For reference the original
e-mail + patch was "[BUG] 2.6.21 hang in
cancel_rearming_dela
On Sat, 26 May 2007 17:40:12 +0200 Folkert van Heusden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> When trying to remove the netconsole module, I got the following kernel
> output after a while (couple of minutes iirc):
>
> [525720.117293] BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1!
> [525720.117353] [] show_trace_lo
On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 06:35:24PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-05-26 at 18:17 +0200, Folkert van Heusden wrote:
> > > > Seems to be hrtimers related - CC'ed Thomas.
> > > I doubt that. The tick interrupt just finds out, that the machine is
> > > stuck in rmmod.
> > > > > Also the r
> > > > > > Seems to be hrtimers related - CC'ed Thomas.
> > > > > I doubt that. The tick interrupt just finds out, that the machine is
> > > > > stuck in rmmod.
> > > > > > > Also the rmmod hangs and would not exit even with kill -9. It also
> > > > > > > sucks up 100% cpu.
> > > > > Can you pleas
On Sat, 2007-05-26 at 18:49 +0200, Folkert van Heusden wrote:
> > > > > Seems to be hrtimers related - CC'ed Thomas.
> > > > I doubt that. The tick interrupt just finds out, that the machine is
> > > > stuck in rmmod.
> > > > > > Also the rmmod hangs and would not exit even with kill -9. It also
>
> > > > Seems to be hrtimers related - CC'ed Thomas.
> > > I doubt that. The tick interrupt just finds out, that the machine is
> > > stuck in rmmod.
> > > > > Also the rmmod hangs and would not exit even with kill -9. It also
> > > > > sucks up 100% cpu.
> > > Can you please enable CONFIG_PROVE_LO
On Sat, 2007-05-26 at 18:17 +0200, Folkert van Heusden wrote:
> > > Seems to be hrtimers related - CC'ed Thomas.
> > I doubt that. The tick interrupt just finds out, that the machine is
> > stuck in rmmod.
> > > > Also the rmmod hangs and would not exit even with kill -9. It also
> > > > sucks up 1
Hi,
> > Seems to be hrtimers related - CC'ed Thomas.
>
> I doubt that. The tick interrupt just finds out, that the machine is
> stuck in rmmod.
Can you please make netconsole unloadable via rmmod? My system seems to
hang every time I do rmmod on netconsole (rmmod using 100% cpu and not
returning
> > Seems to be hrtimers related - CC'ed Thomas.
> I doubt that. The tick interrupt just finds out, that the machine is
> stuck in rmmod.
> > > Also the rmmod hangs and would not exit even with kill -9. It also
> > > sucks up 100% cpu.
> Can you please enable CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING ?
Luckily I alrea
On Sat, 2007-05-26 at 11:53 -0400, Parag Warudkar wrote:
> Seems to be hrtimers related - CC'ed Thomas.
I doubt that. The tick interrupt just finds out, that the machine is
stuck in rmmod.
> > Also the rmmod hangs and would not exit even with kill -9. It also
> > sucks up 100% cpu.
Can you pleas
Seems to be hrtimers related - CC'ed Thomas.
Parag
Folkert van Heusden wrote:
Hi,
When trying to remove the netconsole module, I got the following kernel
output after a while (couple of minutes iirc):
[525720.117293] BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1!
[525720.117353] [] show_trace_log_lvl+0
18 matches
Mail list logo
