Re: [2.6.23-rc3 possible regression] 8250 claims nonexisting device blocking IO port

2007-08-24 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Friday 24 August 2007 11:42:36 am Andrey Borzenkov wrote: > On Tuesday 21 August 2007, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > On Tuesday 21 August 2007 12:28:49 pm Andrey Borzenkov wrote: > > > On Monday 20 August 2007, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > > On Monday 20 August 2007 10:28:22 am Andrey Borzenkov wrote:

Re: [2.6.23-rc3 possible regression] 8250 claims nonexisting device blocking IO port

2007-08-24 Thread Andrey Borzenkov
On Tuesday 21 August 2007, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Tuesday 21 August 2007 12:28:49 pm Andrey Borzenkov wrote: > > On Monday 20 August 2007, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > On Monday 20 August 2007 10:28:22 am Andrey Borzenkov wrote: > > > > This worked in 2.6.22 with the same quirks. I will test witho

Re: [2.6.23-rc3 possible regression] 8250 claims nonexisting device blocking IO port

2007-08-21 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Tuesday 21 August 2007 12:28:49 pm Andrey Borzenkov wrote: > On Monday 20 August 2007, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > On Monday 20 August 2007 10:28:22 am Andrey Borzenkov wrote: > > > This worked in 2.6.22 with the same quirks. I will test without later but > > > I fail to see how they are related. >

Re: [2.6.23-rc3 possible regression] 8250 claims nonexisting device blocking IO port

2007-08-21 Thread Andrey Borzenkov
On Monday 20 August 2007, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Monday 20 August 2007 10:28:22 am Andrey Borzenkov wrote: > > This worked in 2.6.22 with the same quirks. I will test without later but > > I fail to see how they are related. > > OK, let me know what happens. The way it's related is that the qui

Re: [2.6.23-rc3 possible regression] 8250 claims nonexisting device blocking IO port

2007-08-20 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Monday 20 August 2007 10:28:22 am Andrey Borzenkov wrote: > This worked in 2.6.22 with the same quirks. I will test without later but I > fail to see how they are related. OK, let me know what happens. The way it's related is that the quirk fiddles with the IRDA device, and it probably change

Re: [2.6.23-rc3 possible regression] 8250 claims nonexisting device blocking IO port

2007-08-20 Thread Andrey Borzenkov
On Monday 20 August 2007, Andrey Borzenkov wrote: > On Monday 20 August 2007, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > On Saturday 18 August 2007 01:07:55 am Andrey Borzenkov wrote: > > > This is related to thread "2.6.22-rc: regression: no irda0 interface > > > (2.6.21 was OK), smsc does not find chip" but it is

Re: [2.6.23-rc3 possible regression] 8250 claims nonexisting device blocking IO port

2007-08-20 Thread Andrey Borzenkov
On Monday 20 August 2007, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Saturday 18 August 2007 01:07:55 am Andrey Borzenkov wrote: > > This is related to thread "2.6.22-rc: regression: no irda0 interface > > (2.6.21 was OK), smsc does not find chip" but it is already way too > > overloaded. > > > > In 2.6.23 smsc-irc

Re: [2.6.23-rc3 possible regression] 8250 claims nonexisting device blocking IO port

2007-08-19 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Saturday 18 August 2007 01:07:55 am Andrey Borzenkov wrote: > This is related to thread "2.6.22-rc: regression: no irda0 interface (2.6.21 > was OK), smsc does not find chip" but it is already way too overloaded. > > In 2.6.23 smsc-ircc2 fails to initialize IrDA controller. Apparently because