Re: [4/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-09 Thread Andrew
On Thu, March 8, 2007 11:28 pm, Len Brown wrote: > On Monday 05 March 2007 05:35, Antonino A. Daplas wrote: > > > Looks like I got fooled by the negative logic for the nvidia_bugs(). > Please test this patch -- it should fix it, > as well as simplify the code a bit. > > thanks, -Len > Yep. You can

Re: [4/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-08 Thread Len Brown
On Monday 05 March 2007 05:35, Antonino A. Daplas wrote: > On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 02:50 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.21-rc2 compared to 2.6.20 > > that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree. > > > > If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either su

Re: [4/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-05 Thread Andrew
On Mon, March 5, 2007 10:35 am, Antonino A. Daplas wrote: > > This is not a framebuffer nor console problem. > > > I think Andrew Nelless confirmed that the cause is from the above > commit. How to fix it, I don't know. Perhaps the acpi_skip_timer_override > boot option has to > be used. > > Tony

Re: [4/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-05 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 02:50 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Subject: LCD is dimmed (ibm-acpi related) > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/25/206 > Submitter : Jiri Kosina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Caused-By : Richard Purdie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > commit 994efacdf9a087b52f71e620b58

Re: [4/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-05 Thread Antonino A. Daplas
On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 02:50 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.21-rc2 compared to 2.6.20 > that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree. > > If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one > of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsyste