Re: [BUG?] APM is hidden in menuconfig

2008-02-21 Thread Jarek Poplawski
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 07:43:46AM +, Jarek Poplawski wrote: ... > ...Or at least to mention APM in SUSPEND title and description. > Actually, this is really strange: both SUSPEND and PM_SLEEP have > default = y. So it seems they are intended to be more "advertised" > than they are? Now I see

Re: [BUG?] APM is hidden in menuconfig

2008-02-20 Thread Jarek Poplawski
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 02:21:52AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday, 21 of February 2008, Frans Pop wrote: > > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Wednesday, 20 of February 2008, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > > >> So, has it to be so hard? It seems not - at least in good old times... > > > >

Re: [BUG?] APM is hidden in menuconfig

2008-02-20 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, 21 of February 2008, Frans Pop wrote: > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Wednesday, 20 of February 2008, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > >> So, has it to be so hard? It seems not - at least in good old times... > > > > Something in APM uses some code from drivers/base/power/main.c that > > de

Re: [BUG?] APM is hidden in menuconfig

2008-02-20 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday, 20 of February 2008, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > Hi, > > I needed APM to have poweroff on old box. So, in 2.6.24.2 menuconfig: > > 1) Power management options --> >No APM. > 2) [*] Power Management support >No APM. I can see ACPI... > 3) I try searching with "/" + "APM" >AP