On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> [+cc linux-acpi, linux-pci]
>>
>> The _PRT describes motherboard interrupt wiring, which has nothing to
>> do with PCI bus numbers. Our current drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c caches
>> the PCI b
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc linux-acpi, linux-pci]
>
> The _PRT describes motherboard interrupt wiring, which has nothing to
> do with PCI bus numbers. Our current drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c caches
> the PCI bus number along with the _PRT, and I think that's a mistake
[+cc linux-acpi, linux-pci]
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 01:06:27PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> >>
> >> Bjorn, Rafael,
> >>
> >> acpi_pci_irq_add_prt need to be called after pci bridge get scanned,
> >> so we can not call it from pci_acpi_setup, aft
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>
>> Bjorn, Rafael,
>>
>> acpi_pci_irq_add_prt need to be called after pci bridge get scanned,
>> so we can not call it from pci_acpi_setup, after we move dev_register
>> for pci_dev early.
>>
>> The attached debug patch move down that calling i
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 5:02 AM, Peter Hurley
> wrote:
>> On Sun, 2013-02-10 at 22:40 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>> > On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 6:23 AM, Peter Hurley
>>> > wrote:
>>> >>
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 5:02 AM, Peter Hurley
>> wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2013-02-10 at 22:40 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Sun,
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 5:02 AM, Peter Hurley
> wrote:
>> On Sun, 2013-02-10 at 22:40 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>> > On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 6:23 AM, Peter Hurley
>>> > wrote:
>>> >> O
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 5:02 AM, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-02-10 at 22:40 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> > On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 6:23 AM, Peter Hurley
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Sat, 2013-02-09 at 22:14 -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
>> >>> O
On Sun, 2013-02-10 at 22:40 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 6:23 AM, Peter Hurley
> > wrote:
> >> On Sat, 2013-02-09 at 22:14 -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 15:26 -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> >>> > O
On 02/11/2013 07:40 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> Can you try attached debug patch?
FWIW this fixes it for me. No more 'derived' or 'nobody' in dmesg.
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.or
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 6:23 AM, Peter Hurley
> wrote:
>> On Sat, 2013-02-09 at 22:14 -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 15:26 -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
>>> > On Tue, 5 Feb 2013, Peter Hurley wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > With -next-2
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 6:23 AM, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-02-09 at 22:14 -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
>> On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 15:26 -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
>> > On Tue, 5 Feb 2013, Peter Hurley wrote:
>> >
>> > > With -next-20130204:
>> > >
>> > > [ 33.855570] irq 18: nobody cared (try
On Sat, 2013-02-09 at 22:14 -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 15:26 -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Tue, 5 Feb 2013, Peter Hurley wrote:
> >
> > > With -next-20130204:
> > >
> > > [ 33.855570] irq 18: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll"
> > > option)
> > > [ 33.8555
13 matches
Mail list logo
