Correcting my previous message, and confirming Leroy's one :
linux-2.6.20.tar.gz : bad
linux-2.6.20.1.tar.gz: bad
linux-2.6.20.2.tar.gz: good
linux-2.6.20.3.tar.gz: good
With :
COMPAT_VDSO=y
CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G=y
So problem have been solved with 2.6.20.2
Nilshar.
2007/3/15, Leroy van Lo
Chuck Ebbert wrote:
Leroy van Logchem wrote:
Bisecting went well, after 13 compiles this commit was found:
a1f3bb9ae4497a2ed3eac773fd7798ac33a0371f is first bad commit
commit a1f3bb9ae4497a2ed3eac773fd7798ac33a0371f
Author: Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri Jan 26 00:56:46 2007
Leroy van Logchem wrote:
>
> Bisecting went well, after 13 compiles this commit was found:
>
> a1f3bb9ae4497a2ed3eac773fd7798ac33a0371f is first bad commit
> commit a1f3bb9ae4497a2ed3eac773fd7798ac33a0371f
> Author: Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri Jan 26 00:56:46 2007 -0800
>
>
Andi Kleen wrote:
Where does it hang exactly? Do you have a boot log?
Linux version 2.6.20 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.4.6 20060404 (Red Hat
3.4.6-3)) #1 SMP Thu Mar 15 11:06:29 CET 2007
BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
sanitize start
sanitize end
copy_e820_map() start: 000
Hello,
I can confirm that the problem disappear when I disable Compat VDSO
support by setting CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO=n.
Thanks Leroy.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org
On Thursday 15 March 2007 02:01, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 17:52:01 + (UTC) Leroy van Logchem <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Leroy van Logchem wldelft.nl> writes:
> >
Where does it hang exactly? Do you have a boot log?
> > > > > None whatsoever. Three people are rep
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 17:52:01 + (UTC) Leroy van Logchem <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Leroy van Logchem wldelft.nl> writes:
>
> >
> > > > None whatsoever. Three people are reporting this and it's a drop-dead
> > > > showstopper for a 2.6.21 release so we just have to wait until someone
>
Leroy van Logchem wldelft.nl> writes:
>
> > > None whatsoever. Three people are reporting this and it's a drop-dead
> > > showstopper for a 2.6.21 release so we just have to wait until someone
> > > wakes up and thinks about it.
>
> The topic should be "when CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G=y" imo.
>
> I'll
> > None whatsoever. Three people are reporting this and it's a drop-dead
> > showstopper for a 2.6.21 release so we just have to wait until someone
> > wakes up and thinks about it.
The topic should be "when CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G=y" imo.
I'll try to do my first bi-sect today.
--
Leroy
-
To unsubs
On 14/03/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 03:13:25 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8040
>
>
>
>
>
> --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-14 03:13 ---
> Any news on that bug please ?
None wh
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 03:13:25 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8040
> >
> >
> > --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-14 03:13 ---
> > Any news on that bug please ?
>
> None what
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 03:13:25 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8040
>
>
>
>
>
> --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-14 03:13 ---
> Any news on that bug please ?
None whatsoever. Three people are reporting this and it'
12 matches
Mail list logo
