"Paul Menage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 3/13/07, Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> How do we determine what is shared, and goes into the shared zones?
>> Once we've allocated a page, it's too late because we already picked.
>> Do we just assume all page cache is shared? Base it on
On 3/13/07, Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How do we determine what is shared, and goes into the shared zones?
Once we've allocated a page, it's too late because we already picked.
Do we just assume all page cache is shared? Base it on filesystem,
mount, ...? Mount seems the most logica
Eric,
>>>And misses every resource sharing opportunity in sight.
>>
>>that was my point too.
>>
>>
>>>Except for
>>>filtering the which pages are eligible for reclaim an RSS limit should
>>>not need to change the existing reclaim logic, and with things like the
>>>memory zones we have had that kin
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 03:48:34AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 13:19:53 +0300 Kirill Korotaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > Andrew Morton wrote:
> > - shared mappings of 'shared' files (binaries
> > and libraries) to allow for reduced memory
> > foo
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 13:19:53 +0300 Kirill Korotaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> - shared mappings of 'shared' files (binaries
> and libraries) to allow for reduced memory
> footprint when N identical guests are running
> >>>
> >>>So, it sounds like this
Andrew Morton wrote:
- shared mappings of 'shared' files (binaries
and libraries) to allow for reduced memory
footprint when N identical guests are running
>>>
>>>So, it sounds like this can be phrased as a requirement like:
>>>
>>> "Guests must be able to share pages."
>>>
Kirill Korotaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Eric,
>
>> And misses every resource sharing opportunity in sight.
>
> that was my point too.
>
>> Except for
>> filtering the which pages are eligible for reclaim an RSS limit should
>> not need to change the existing reclaim logic, and with things li
Eric,
> And misses every resource sharing opportunity in sight.
that was my point too.
> Except for
> filtering the which pages are eligible for reclaim an RSS limit should
> not need to change the existing reclaim logic, and with things like the
> memory zones we have had that kind of restricti
8 matches
Mail list logo
