Re: [Fwd: TASK_SIZE is variable.]

2005-01-25 Thread David Woodhouse
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 22:46 +, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Bad things can happen if a 32-bit process is the last user of a 64-bit > > mm. TASK_SIZE isn't a constant, and we can end up clearing page tables > > only up to the 32-bit TASK_SIZE instead of all the way. We should > > probably double

Re: [Fwd: TASK_SIZE is variable.]

2005-01-25 Thread Christoph Hellwig
Content-Description: Forwarded message - TASK_SIZE is variable. > Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 22:26:52 + > From: David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: TASK_SIZE is variable. > To: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org > X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-3.dwmw2.1) > > Bad things can happen if a 32-bi