Re: [GIT PULL] A minor amd64_edac fix for 3.13

2013-11-16 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 02:22:15AM +0100, Frank Becker wrote: > Still, Google made a mistake by tagging Boris mail as SPAM. As you > already wrote it probably was triggered by the content filter. They > don't tell. To get those filters right is probably impossible. BTW, I > liked your idea to tag p

Re: [GIT PULL] A minor amd64_edac fix for 3.13

2013-11-16 Thread Frank Becker
Linus Torvalds [2013-11-17, 00:52 +0100]: > On Nov 16, 2013 3:34 PM, "Frank Becker" wrote: Hi, > > Blaming the server provider is nonsense. > > BS. :-) Looks like an authentic mail. Who needs crypto-signatures? > If the service provider allows spammers, the service provider is shit. It > reall

Re: [GIT PULL] A minor amd64_edac fix for 3.13

2013-11-16 Thread Frank Becker
Borislav Petkov [2013-11-16, 19:23 +0100]: > On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 10:10:05AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: Hi, > > Ahh. Yes. Googling for "hetzner online spam", and there's a *lot* of > > complaints. See for example > > > > > > http://www.spamrankings.net/rankv2/2013/09/01/monthly/world/vo

Re: [GIT PULL] A minor amd64_edac fix for 3.13

2013-11-16 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 10:10:05AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Ahh. Yes. Googling for "hetzner online spam", and there's a *lot* of > complaints. See for example > > > http://www.spamrankings.net/rankv2/2013/09/01/monthly/world/volume/cbl/all/regular/ Yowza, this is just great! :-( > whic

Re: [GIT PULL] A minor amd64_edac fix for 3.13

2013-11-16 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 02:50:49AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > >> The most common reason seems to be that your email provide is >> associated with spam, sometimes just because of a shared ISP. > > Sure, it is one: https://www.hetzner.de/

Re: [GIT PULL] A minor amd64_edac fix for 3.13

2013-11-16 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 02:50:49AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > As far as I can tell, only that one email had gotten caught by the > spam filter. So it may be something in the body of the email itself, > although I don't really see what that could be either.. Right. > It happens occasionally, a

Re: [GIT PULL] A minor amd64_edac fix for 3.13

2013-11-16 Thread Borislav Petkov
And just to test whether you're getting emails from me, I'll send this one again from my other mail address to try to maximize the probability of some version actually reaching you :-) On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 06:02:59PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > [ This was in my spam collection. I don't quite

Re: [GIT PULL] A minor amd64_edac fix for 3.13

2013-11-16 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 06:02:59PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > [ This was in my spam collection. I don't quite know why, but it might > signify problems with your email setup. Quite often, when gmail is > unhappy about kernel developer emails, it's been because their email > provider ends up doi

Re: [GIT PULL] A minor amd64_edac fix for 3.13

2013-11-15 Thread Linus Torvalds
[ This was in my spam collection. I don't quite know why, but it might signify problems with your email setup. Quite often, when gmail is unhappy about kernel developer emails, it's been because their email provider ends up doing something odd. But the headers actually have "spf=pass" and "dkim=pa