Re: [GIT PULL] Disintegrate UAPI for m68k [ver #2]

2012-10-12 Thread David Howells
Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > This leaves the following empty construct: > > #ifdef CONFIG_COLDFIRE > #else > #endif Odd. It emitted it in both headers, which it shouldn't have. > I'll remove it in a subsequent patch. Thanks. David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "

Re: [GIT PULL] Disintegrate UAPI for m68k [ver #2]

2012-10-12 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:15 AM, David Howells wrote: > arch/m68k/include/asm/ptrace.h | 72 + This leaves the following empty construct: #ifdef CONFIG_COLDFIRE #else #endif I'll remove it in a subsequent patch. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert

Re: [GIT PULL] Disintegrate UAPI for m68k [ver #2]

2012-10-11 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:15 AM, David Howells wrote: > Can you merge the following branch into the m68k tree please. Thanks! I will look into it, but I won't merge it before 3.7-rc1. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -

Re: [GIT PULL] Disintegrate UAPI for m68k

2012-10-05 Thread David Howells
Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > I assume these c6x and asm-generic changes are the ones you just asked Linus > to pull? Yes. > Doesn't it make more sense to ask us (the individual arch maintainers) to > pull our parts after Linus has pulled the generic part? I suppose so. > Do you want this ("our

Re: [GIT PULL] Disintegrate UAPI for m68k

2012-10-05 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 9:51 PM, David Howells wrote: > git://git.infradead.org/users/dhowells/linux-headers.git disintegrate-m68k > > for you to fetch changes up to b039235da939b28c539b3e1b4566107a9bdbdef8: > > UAPI: (Scripted) Disintegrate arch/m68k/include/asm (2012-10-04 18:20:56 > +0100)