Jonas Bonn wrote:
> I gave this a try and it all looks good for OpenRISC. I'll be happy, in
> principle, to push this for 3.7... but it's a bit disconcerting that
> there's a bunch of stuff here that shouldn't be going via the OpenRISC
> tree. Any chance you could give a heads-up when
Hi David,
On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 20:51 +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Can you merge the following branch into the openrisc tree please.
>
> This is to complete part of the UAPI disintegration for which the preparatory
> patches were pulled recently.
>
> Note that there are some fixup patches
Hi David,
On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 20:51 +0100, David Howells wrote:
Can you merge the following branch into the openrisc tree please.
This is to complete part of the UAPI disintegration for which the preparatory
patches were pulled recently.
Note that there are some fixup patches which are
Jonas Bonn jo...@southpole.se wrote:
I gave this a try and it all looks good for OpenRISC. I'll be happy, in
principle, to push this for 3.7... but it's a bit disconcerting that
there's a bunch of stuff here that shouldn't be going via the OpenRISC
tree. Any chance you could give a heads-up
4 matches
Mail list logo
