On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 06:01:41AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 5:40 AM, Linus Torvalds
> wrote:
> >
> > You didn't actually test what you sent me. YOU TESTED SOMETHING
> > ENTIRELY DIFFERENT.
>
> Btw, it worries me that not only are you in denial about this,
> apparentl
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 5:40 AM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> You didn't actually test what you sent me. YOU TESTED SOMETHING
> ENTIRELY DIFFERENT.
Btw, it worries me that not only are you in denial about this,
apparently you have always done it:
"But I have always merged the tip/x86/ras branch w
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 5:30 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> Ok, now this is really uncalled for.
No, it really isn't.
You still seem to be in denial:
> And dammit, I did test the hell of this thing. Like everything else I'm
> testing. I'm trying to do my best but I can only try.
NO YOU DID NOT
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 05:14:34AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> This shows such a fundamental misunderstanding of what you should send
> me that in starting to doubt all your other pull requests. How many of
> them worked by our luck? If you are not testing what you actually send
> me, I simply d
On Jun 24, 2015 00:40, "Borislav Petkov" wrote:
>
> > The patches are based on 4.1-rc1. If it doesn't work on top of that,
> > then that means that you clearly have tested *none* of this. Which
> > just makes me go "yeah, I'm not pulling untested crap".
>
> Of course it has been tested but with th
5 matches
Mail list logo
