On Mon, 12 May 2025 at 11:14, Dmitry Antipov wrote:
>
> Technically speaking you're right, and I will take notice on that for
> further commits. OTOH replying with "please adjust commit message and
> send v2" could be the way faster.
I suspect it ends up depending on the people.
Personally, I te
On 5/9/25 7:19 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
At a minimum, the *description* of this bug is garbage.
It talks about an "uninitialized completion pointer", but then the fix
actually depends on it being initialized - just initialized to NULL.
I do believe that it always is initialized, and I have pu
On 5/9/25 18:19, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, 9 May 2025 at 08:09, Petr Pavlu wrote:
>>
>> The fix has been on modules-next only since yesterday but should be safe.
>
> Hmm.
>
> At a minimum, the *description* of this bug is garbage.
>
> It talks about an "uninitialized completion pointer",
The pull request you sent on Fri, 9 May 2025 17:09:54 +0200:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/modules/linux.git/
> tags/modules-6.15-rc6
has been merged into torvalds/linux.git:
https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/29fe5d50dfa6b61043e2e89206389ae56b5596eb
Thank you!
--
Deet-doot-d
On Fri, 9 May 2025 at 08:09, Petr Pavlu wrote:
>
> The fix has been on modules-next only since yesterday but should be safe.
Hmm.
At a minimum, the *description* of this bug is garbage.
It talks about an "uninitialized completion pointer", but then the fix
actually depends on it being initializ
5 matches
Mail list logo
