On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 10:38:41AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Also, now that the other architectures are gone, a lot of changes can
> be done more easily that will be incompatible with a pure revert, so
> the more time passes, the harder it will get to do that.
Yes, and an out-of-tree arch port
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 10:01 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Tue 2018-04-03 11:18:15, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> In reality, a resurrection may not be implemented as a pure revert, but as
>> the addition of a new architecture, implemented using modern features (DT,
>> CCF, ...).
>
> By insisting o
On Tue 2018-04-03 11:18:15, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 9:54 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 8:57 PM, Linus Torvalds
> > wrote:
> > Regarding a possible revert, that would indeed involve reverting
> > multiple patches for most architectures, plus parts o
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 9:54 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 8:57 PM, Linus Torvalds
> wrote:
> Regarding a possible revert, that would indeed involve reverting
> multiple patches for most architectures, plus parts of at least these
> three:
>
> Documentation: arch-support: rem
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 12:17 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> The series is rather long and conflicts in trivial ways with lots
> of subsystem trees. You probably want to pull it either really
> early in the merge window or really late.
Ok, I've been pulling arch updates, so it went in now.
Side not
On Mon, 02 Apr 2018 00:17:30 PDT (-0700), Arnd Bergmann wrote:
- openrisc, risc-v and nds32 are still in the process of finishing their
support or getting it added to mainline gcc in the first place.
They all have patched gcc-7.3 ports that work to some degree, but
complete upstream support
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 8:57 PM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 12:17 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>
>> (dirstat only for brevity)
>
> Shortlog?
>
> I'd like to see that each architecture removal is independent of the
> others, so that if somebody wants to resurrect any particular
> a
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 12:17 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> (dirstat only for brevity)
Shortlog?
I'd like to see that each architecture removal is independent of the
others, so that if somebody wants to resurrect any particular
architecture, he/she can do so with a revert.
Can I just fetch things
8 matches
Mail list logo
