* Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> The printk changes for full dynticks support are still pending while
> we don't know Linus's opinion about these. Meanwhile here is the
> part of it that I think is uncontroversial. This way we can make
> the next submission attempt to Linus a bit mor
Hi,
[trimmed recipient list]
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 11:12:09PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> 2013/1/16 Andreas Mohr :
> > Hell yeah that does sound like a potential candidate to me.
> >
> > Andreas Mohr
>
> I doubt it. I don't see a sound driver using struct irq_work:
>
> $git grep -F "s
2013/1/16 Andreas Mohr :
> Hi,
>
>> These three patches are general fixes for irq work. The two first
>> patches fix tight races on global irq work claiming that prevent the irq work
>> subsystem from dropping a work enqueuing attempt because it thinks it's
>> already pending while it may be alread
Hi,
> These three patches are general fixes for irq work. The two first
> patches fix tight races on global irq work claiming that prevent the irq work
> subsystem from dropping a work enqueuing attempt because it thinks it's
> already pending while it may be already executing or executed.
Would
4 matches
Mail list logo
