In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Al Boldi writes:
> Erez Zadok wrote:
> > Al, we have back-ports of the latest Unionfs to 2.6.{22,21,20,19,18,9},
> > all in http://unionfs.filesystems.org/. Before we release any change, we
> > test it on all back-ports as well as the latest -rc/-mm code base (takes
Erez Zadok wrote:
> Al, we have back-ports of the latest Unionfs to 2.6.{22,21,20,19,18,9},
> all in http://unionfs.filesystems.org/. Before we release any change, we
> test it on all back-ports as well as the latest -rc/-mm code base (takes
> over 24 hours straight to get through all of our regre
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Al Boldi writes:
> Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> > The following is a series of patches related to Unionfs, which include
> > three small VFS/fsstack patches and one eCryptfs patch; the rest are
> > Unionfs patches. The patches here represent several months of work an
Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> The following is a series of patches related to Unionfs, which include
> three small VFS/fsstack patches and one eCryptfs patch; the rest are
> Unionfs patches. The patches here represent several months of work and
> testing under various conditions, especially low-memo
4 matches
Mail list logo
