> > If the above procmail filter doesn't work (untested) let me know
> > and I will MAKE it work. Windows users - tough luck - procmail
> > is open source - hire someone to port it...
This procmail rule has caught all the mail, never slipped even one in the
last year:
:0
* ^Sender:
If the above procmail filter doesn't work (untested) let me know
and I will MAKE it work. Windows users - tough luck - procmail
is open source - hire someone to port it...
This procmail rule has caught all the mail, never slipped even one in the
last year:
:0
* ^Sender:
>
> if you use an MUA that can't do filtering, well then there's something
> wrong with you
I really don't believe there is any need for this kind of attitude.
/Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> If the above procmail filter doesn't work (untested) let me know
> and I will MAKE it work. Windows users - tough luck - procmail
> is open source - hire someone to port it...
and even windows users can filter properly. netscape allows you to add
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Mike A. Harris wrote:
If the above procmail filter doesn't work (untested) let me know
and I will MAKE it work. Windows users - tough luck - procmail
is open source - hire someone to port it...
and even windows users can filter properly. netscape allows you to add
if you use an MUA that can't do filtering, well then there's something
wrong with you
I really don't believe there is any need for this kind of attitude.
/Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I haven't complained about any of this on the list until now, because
> I know I'm in the minority and I don't expect most people to care
> about my problems. But it bothered me seeing the criticism Mike
> Harrold has gotten for his request. Not everyone has problems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I haven't complained about any of this on the list until now, because
I know I'm in the minority and I don't expect most people to care
about my problems. But it bothered me seeing the criticism Mike
Harrold has gotten for his request. Not everyone has problems
"Mike A. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>What is right:
>
>1) not putting the thing in the subject from the list side
>2) If an end user wants it in the subject, they can set up a mail
>filter to PUT it in the subject.
>
>:0 fwh
>* ^Sender:.*owner-linux-kernel
>| sed -e 's/^Subject:
bject header if mailing lists put the list name in the DATE
header.
Date: [linux-kernel] Jan 12, 2000
Pretty dumb eh? And annoying. And, you cant read the date in
index mode because all you see is:
419 [linux-k Timur Tabi (3,617) Re: [LK] Re: lkml subject line
Can't see the
** Reply to message from "Mike A. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on
Tue, 13 Feb 2001 03:53:13 -0500 (EST)
> >I disagree, and while I may be in the minority on this list, I am certainly
> >not in the minority across the board, given that virtually every mailing list
> >I am subscribed to DOES
>
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Mike Harrold wrote:
>
> >> Those would all be your problems and I would suggest using a different account
> >> for mail then.
> >
> >Out of interest, how would that solve anything? So I use an ISP instead.
> >Then I have to download all my mail to home to read it. Talk
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Mike Harrold wrote:
>> Those would all be your problems and I would suggest using a different account
>> for mail then.
>
>Out of interest, how would that solve anything? So I use an ISP instead.
>Then I have to download all my mail to home to read it. Talk about a
>total
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Mike Harrold wrote:
Those would all be your problems and I would suggest using a different account
for mail then.
Out of interest, how would that solve anything? So I use an ISP instead.
Then I have to download all my mail to home to read it. Talk about a
total waste of
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Mike Harrold wrote:
Those would all be your problems and I would suggest using a different account
for mail then.
Out of interest, how would that solve anything? So I use an ISP instead.
Then I have to download all my mail to home to read it. Talk about a
total
** Reply to message from "Mike A. Harris" [EMAIL PROTECTED] on
Tue, 13 Feb 2001 03:53:13 -0500 (EST)
I disagree, and while I may be in the minority on this list, I am certainly
not in the minority across the board, given that virtually every mailing list
I am subscribed to DOES prepend a tag
nel] Jan 12, 2000
Pretty dumb eh? And annoying. And, you cant read the date in
index mode because all you see is:
419 [linux-k Timur Tabi (3,617) Re: [LK] Re: lkml subject line
Can't see the date because the dumb list puts the listname in the
date field!
No different for subj
"Mike A. Harris" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is right:
1) not putting the thing in the subject from the list side
2) If an end user wants it in the subject, they can set up a mail
filter to PUT it in the subject.
:0 fwh
* ^Sender:.*owner-linux-kernel
| sed -e 's/^Subject: /Subject: [lkml]/'
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Mike Harrold wrote:
> > Those would all be your problems and I would suggest using a different account
> > for mail then.
>
> Out of interest, how would that solve anything? So I use an ISP instead.
> Then I have to download all my mail to home to read it. Talk about a
>
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Mike Harrold wrote:
Those would all be your problems and I would suggest using a different account
for mail then.
Out of interest, how would that solve anything? So I use an ISP instead.
Then I have to download all my mail to home to read it. Talk about a
total
20 matches
Mail list logo
