Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> Do modular framebuffers really make sense?
Yes. e.g., on embedded systems you may not use the display hardware
(and would therefore like to save a bit of memory) but it's convenient
to have only one build of the kernel/modules.
> OK, distributions like to make everything
On Tuesday 01 March 2005 10:41, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while looking how to fix modular FB_SAVAGE_* (both FB_SAVAGE_I2C=m and
> FB_SAVAGE_ACCEL=m are currently broken) I asked myself:
>
> Do modular framebuffers really make sense?
>
> OK, distributions like to make everything modular, but all
2 matches
Mail list logo
