On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 09:53:00PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 15:16 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > > Chris Friesen wrote:
> > >> Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> +Thunderbird (GUI)
> > >>> +
> > >>> +By default, thunderbird likes to mangle text,
>> On Sep 11 2007 21:26, Chris Friesen wrote:
>>> Thunderbird, at least, will automatically inline a single text/plain
>>> attachment when replying. (At least with my current settings, it does.)
I dont know about Thunderbird, but Seamonkey apparently only includes
text/plain attachments in the rep
On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 15:16 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Chris Friesen wrote:
> >> Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >>
> >>> +Thunderbird (GUI)
> >>> +
> >>> +By default, thunderbird likes to mangle text, but there are ways to
> >>> +coerce it into being nice.
> >>
> >> Can someone des
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Chris Friesen wrote:
Randy Dunlap wrote:
+Thunderbird (GUI)
+
+By default, thunderbird likes to mangle text, but there are ways to
+coerce it into being nice.
Can someone describe the problems with just attaching the patch in
Thunderbird? It's what Martin says he does on
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Sep 11 2007 21:26, Chris Friesen wrote:
Thunderbird, at least, will automatically inline a single text/plain attachment
when replying. (At least with my current settings, it does.)
No, the thing is: you send it attached with Thunderbird,
and my PINE strips it on rep
On Sep 11 2007 21:26, Chris Friesen wrote:
>> > Can someone describe the problems with just attaching the patch in
>> > Thunderbird? It's what Martin says he does on the linked document...
>
>> Email clients don't like to quote attachments, even text/plain ones, which
>> then makes attached patch
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 08:02:29AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 01:24:13PM +0800, WANG Cong wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 08:29:26PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 10:16:44AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> ...
> +~
Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 01:24:13PM +0800, WANG Cong wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 08:29:26PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 10:16:44AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
...
+~~
+Mutt (TUI)
+
+Plenty of Linux develo
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 01:24:13PM +0800, WANG Cong wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 08:29:26PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 10:16:44AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >>...
> >> +~~
> >> +Mutt (TUI)
> >> +
> >> +Plenty of Linux d
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 08:29:26PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 10:16:44AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>...
>> +~~
>> +Mutt (TUI)
>> +
>> +Plenty of Linux developers use mutt, so it must work pretty well.
>> +
>> +Are there any s
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 08:52:14PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
>On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 14:38 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
>> On 9/11/07, Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 10:16 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> >
>> > > +~
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 19:36:42 +0200 Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 10:16 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
> > +~~
> > +Evolutions (GUI)
>
> I take it you mean: Evolution
Yep, lousy keyboard. ;)
I've updated the text file and will resen
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Chris Friesen wrote:
Can someone describe the problems with just attaching the patch in
Thunderbird? It's what Martin says he does on the linked document...
Email clients don't like to quote attachments, even text/plain ones,
which then makes attached patches much more d
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 14:38:13 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> You can also diff -Nru old.c new.c | xclip, select Preformat, then
> paste with the middle button.
mutt does not come with text editor, so
I'd like to add note about vim:
If using xclip, type command
:set paste
before middle button or sh
On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 14:38 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> On 9/11/07, Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 10:16 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >
> > > +~~
> > > +Evolutions (GUI)
> >
> > I take it you mean: Evolution
> >
>
Chris Friesen wrote:
Randy Dunlap wrote:
+Thunderbird (GUI)
+
+By default, thunderbird likes to mangle text, but there are ways to
+coerce it into being nice.
Can someone describe the problems with just attaching the patch in
Thunderbird? It's what Martin says he does on the linked document
Randy Dunlap wrote:
> +Alpine (TUI)
...
> +Evolutions (GUI)
Evolution_ ?
...
> +Kmail (GUI)
...
> +Lotus Notes (GUI)
...
> +Mutt (TUI)
...
> +Pine (TUI)
...
> +Sylpheed (GUI)
...
> +Thunderbird (GUI)
...
+~~
+TkRat (GUI)
+
+Works. Use "Insert file
Chris Friesen wrote:
Randy Dunlap wrote:
+Thunderbird (GUI)
+
+By default, thunderbird likes to mangle text, but there are ways to
+coerce it into being nice.
Can someone describe the problems with just attaching the patch in
Thunderbird? It's what Martin says he does on the linked document
Randy Dunlap wrote:
+Thunderbird (GUI)
+
+By default, thunderbird likes to mangle text, but there are ways to
+coerce it into being nice.
Can someone describe the problems with just attaching the patch in
Thunderbird? It's what Martin says he does on the linked document...
Chris
-
To unsu
On Sep 11 2007 20:17, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>There were no problems with sending patches in pine.
>
>Pine had problems with UTF-8, and that's where alpine is fixed, but
>that's a more tangential problem.
Pine [4.64] has problems with ISO-2022-JP, but not UTF-8 AFAICT.
Jan
--
-
To unsubsc
On Sep 11 2007 14:03, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>> +Alpine (TUI)
>> +
>> +
>> +
>> +Are any special config options needed?
>
>Alpine is the successor of Pine. Issues that were found in some earlier
>Pine versions wrt patch sending are now fixed.
>
>Here's the relevant config options. In the "Sending
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 02:31:16PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 02:03:34PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > > On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > >...
> > > > +Alpine (TUI)
> > > > +
> > > > +
> > > > +
> > > > +Are any
On 9/11/07, Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 10:16 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
> > +~~
> > +Evolutions (GUI)
>
> I take it you mean: Evolution
>
> > +Some people seem to use this successfully for patches.
> > +
> > +W
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 10:16:44AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>...
> +~~
> +Mutt (TUI)
> +
> +Plenty of Linux developers use mutt, so it must work pretty well.
> +
> +Are there any special config options that are needed??
>...
It should work with def
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 02:03:34PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >...
> > > +Alpine (TUI)
> > > +
> > > +
> > > +
> > > +Are any special config options needed?
> >
> > Alpine is the successor of Pine. Issues t
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 02:03:34PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>...
> > +Alpine (TUI)
> > +
> > +
> > +
> > +Are any special config options needed?
>
> Alpine is the successor of Pine. Issues that were found in some earlier
> Pine versions wrt patch sen
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> From: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Requested by Jeff Garzik.
>
> Add info about various email clients and their applicability
> in being used to send Linux kernel patches.
>
> Some notes takes from http://mbligh.org/linuxdocs/Email/Clients
> Po
On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 10:16 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> +~~
> +Evolutions (GUI)
I take it you mean: Evolution
> +Some people seem to use this successfully for patches.
> +
> +What config options are needed?
When composing mail select: Preformat
28 matches
Mail list logo
