On Monday, July 2, 2018 2:52:24 PM CEST Sudeep Holla wrote:
>
> On 02/07/18 12:01, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 11:57 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 02/07/18 10:06, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 6:17 PM, Sudeep Holla
> >>> wrote:
>
Hi,
On 07/02/2018 04:57 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
On 02/07/18 10:06, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 6:17 PM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
Currently we use the ACPI processor ID only for the leaf/processor nodes
as the specification states it must match the value of ACPI processor ID
Hi,
On 06/29/2018 11:17 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
Currently we use the ACPI processor ID only for the leaf/processor nodes
as the specification states it must match the value of ACPI processor ID
field in the processor’s entry in the MADT.
However, if a PPTT structure represents processors group,
On 02/07/18 12:01, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 11:57 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 02/07/18 10:06, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 6:17 PM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
Currently we use the ACPI processor ID only for the leaf/processor nodes
as
On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 11:57 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>
>
> On 02/07/18 10:06, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 6:17 PM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>> Currently we use the ACPI processor ID only for the leaf/processor nodes
>>> as the specification states it must match the value of AC
On 29/06/18 19:18, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 06/29/2018 11:17 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> Currently we use the ACPI processor ID only for the leaf/processor nodes
>> as the specification states it must match the value of ACPI processor ID
>> field in the processor’s entry in the MADT.
>>
On 30/06/18 08:16, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 05:17:57PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> Currently we use the ACPI processor ID only for the leaf/processor nodes
>> as the specification states it must match the value of ACPI processor ID
>> field in the processor’s entry in the
On 02/07/18 10:06, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 6:17 PM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> Currently we use the ACPI processor ID only for the leaf/processor nodes
>> as the specification states it must match the value of ACPI processor ID
>> field in the processor’s entry in the MAD
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 6:17 PM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Currently we use the ACPI processor ID only for the leaf/processor nodes
> as the specification states it must match the value of ACPI processor ID
> field in the processor’s entry in the MADT.
>
> However, if a PPTT structure represents proce
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 05:17:57PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Currently we use the ACPI processor ID only for the leaf/processor nodes
> as the specification states it must match the value of ACPI processor ID
> field in the processor’s entry in the MADT.
>
> However, if a PPTT structure represe
Hi,
On 06/29/2018 11:17 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
Currently we use the ACPI processor ID only for the leaf/processor nodes
as the specification states it must match the value of ACPI processor ID
field in the processor’s entry in the MADT.
However, if a PPTT structure represents processors group,
11 matches
Mail list logo