On Tuesday, May 05, 2015 02:24:25 PM Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 02:49:55AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > Thanks, I have an update, though.
> >
> > In a recent discussion with Darren we've come to the conlusion that
> > having a parent with PRP0001 and "compatible"
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 02:49:55AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> Thanks, I have an update, though.
>
> In a recent discussion with Darren we've come to the conlusion that
> having a parent with PRP0001 and "compatible" and a child with PRP0001 only
> (without "compatible") is useful in case
On Wednesday, April 22, 2015 12:57:18 PM Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 03:54:16AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Any comments?
> >
> > > ---
> > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> > > Subject: ACPI / property: Refine consistency check for PRP0001
> > >
> > > Refine the check for
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 03:54:16AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Any comments?
>
> > ---
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> > Subject: ACPI / property: Refine consistency check for PRP0001
> >
> > Refine the check for the presence of the "compatible" property
> > if the PRP0001 device ID is prese
On Tuesday, April 14, 2015 03:03:33 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 14, 2015 01:50:11 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, April 13, 2015 07:04:14 PM Darren Hart wrote:
> > > On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 01:28:45AM +0200, Rafael Wysocki wrote:
> > > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> > >
On Tuesday, April 14, 2015 01:50:11 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, April 13, 2015 07:04:14 PM Darren Hart wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 01:28:45AM +0200, Rafael Wysocki wrote:
> > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> > >
> > > If the special PRP0001 device ID is present in the given device'
On Monday, April 13, 2015 07:04:14 PM Darren Hart wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 01:28:45AM +0200, Rafael Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> >
> > If the special PRP0001 device ID is present in the given device's list
> > of ACPI/PNP IDs and the device has a valid "compatible" propert
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 01:28:45AM +0200, Rafael Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>
> If the special PRP0001 device ID is present in the given device's list
> of ACPI/PNP IDs and the device has a valid "compatible" property in
> the _DSD, it should be enumerated using the default mechanis
8 matches
Mail list logo